Back

In silico analysis of the invasion mechanics and invasiveness of the plasmodium falciparum merozoite

Msosa, C.; Abdalrahman, T.; Franz, T.

2026-02-06 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.06.26.661885 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although there has been considerable progress in understanding the factors that determine the invasiveness of plasmodium falciparum merozoites, the collective role of the biophysical characteristics of erythrocyte deformability in the invasion process is poorly understood. Cell shape, cytoplasmic viscosity, and membrane stability are the main determinants of erythrocyte deformability, but it remains unknown how these properties affect the merozoite invasiveness. This study aimed to investigate computationally (i) the role of erythrocyte morphology and merozoite-induced erythrocyte membrane damage in merozoite invasion and (ii) the suitability of mechanical markers of merozoite-induced erythrocyte membrane damage for screening of invasion-blocking antimalarial drugs. Finite element models were developed to represent a human erythrocyte and a spherocyte, their invasion by a malaria merozoite, and erythrocyte compression and nanoindentation as mechanical assays for membrane damage. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics represented the erythrocyte cytoplasm, and merozoite-induced erythrocyte membrane damage was implemented with a constitutive model. The invasiveness of the merozoite decreases with increased erythrocyte sphericity associated with genetic disorders such as hereditary spherocytosis. The invasiveness is larger when membrane damage is induced in the erythrocyte at an early invasion stage than throughout the invasion process. The minimum force required for a malaria merozoite to invade a human erythrocyte was predicted to be 11 pN. The findings on the invasion mechanics can guide future studies into the invasiveness of the merozoite. The nanoindentation simulations point to the potential of nanoindentation to determine erythrocyte membrane damage for screening novel invasion-blocking anti-malaria drugs.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.1%
3
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
6
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.0%
7
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
13
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
15
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
17
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Journal of Biosciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%