Back

Safety of Pharmacologic Dilation: Acute Angle Closure Incidence in a Los Angeles County-Wide Safety Net Teleretinal Screening Program

Lang, T.; Xu, B. Y.; Li, Z.; Iyengar, S.; Kesselman, C.; Ambite, J.-L.; Bolo, K.; Do, J.; Wong, B.; Daskivich, L.

2025-06-28 ophthalmology
10.1101/2025.06.26.25330091 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportancePharmacologic dilation is vital for eye disease screening but is often avoided due to concerns about triggering acute angle closure (AAC), a sight-threatening ophthalmic emergency. ObjectiveTo assess AAC incidence after dilation and validate the use of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for identifying AAC cases. DesignRetrospective cohort study SettingPrimary care-based teleretinal diabetic retinopathy screening (TDRS) program ParticipantsEligible participants were Los Angeles County (LAC) Department of Health Services (DHS) patients who underwent teleretinal screening by dilated fundus photography between August 23, 2013, and March 1, 2024. Potential AAC cases were identified using ICD codes for angle closure, including acute angle closure glaucoma (AACG), primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG), and anatomical narrow angle (ANA), within three months of dilation. All urgent care, emergency department, and eye clinic encounters within the next calendar day after TDRS and encounters with Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for iridectomy/iridotomy or lens extraction within 14 calendar days of TDRS were also identified. Manual chart review was conducted to verify AAC cases and extract clinical information. ExposuresDilation with 1.0% or 0.5% tropicamide. Main Outcomes and MeasuresCumulative incidence of AAC after dilation. Results84,008 patients received 168,796 dilations with a mean of 2.01 {+/-} 1.50 (mean {+/-} standard deviation) dilations per patient. 55.1% were female. Mean age was 55.4 {+/-} 10.7 (mean {+/-} standard deviation) years. The cohort was 67.7% Hispanic, 8.2% Black, 6.3% Asian, 4.1% White, and 2.4% Other. Manual chart review confirmed four AAC cases after dilation: 3 coded as AACG and 1 as ANA. The AAC risk was 2.4 (95% CI 0.05-4.69) per 100,000 dilations (0.0024%) or 4.8 (95% CI 0.10-9.43) per 100,000 patients (0.0048%). All four cases were female, had narrow angles in the non-presenting eye on gonioscopy, and presented within one day with AAC symptoms, including eye pain and blurry vision. Conclusions and RelevanceAAC risk was less than 1 in 40,000 per dilation in a high-volume TDRS program serving a diverse, safety net population, supporting the overall safety of dilation in this setting. Further discussion about AAC risk as a contraindication to dilation is warranted.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.8%
3
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
5
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
7
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
8
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
9
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
11
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
12
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
13
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
14
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%
24
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%