Back

Isolation Methods of Tumor Endothelial Cells Impact AngiomiR Profiles

Pecot, C. V.; Edatt, L.; Dixit, G.; Azam, S. H.; Tsai, Y. S.; Dudley, A. C.

2025-07-03 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.06.25.661572 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play an important role in endothelial cell growth and differentiation. Tumor angiogenesis-specific miRNAs (angiomiRs) are a subset of miRNAs that are dyregulated in tumor endothelial cells. Because of the importance of angiogenesis in cancer progression, regulation of angiomiRs may have significant therapeutic implications. However, discovery of angiomiRs has often been limited by biased model systems that may not be valid. Here, we evaluated whether the variable expression levels of angiomiRs in endothelial cells were impacted by the isolation methods used to profile them. Using an autochthonous, genetically engineered mouse model of lung adenocarcinoma, we used Nanostring to profile miRNA expression levels of normal lung endothelial cells (NECs) to tumor endothelial cells (TECs) using two endothelial cell (EC) isolation methods: 1) staining and sorting ECs directly from tumors ("in vivo"), and 2) magnetic bead isolation and sub-cloning ECs ("in vitro"). We then compared candidate angiomiRs with the profiles from two orthotopic, immunocompetent lung cancer models. When TECs were directly enriched from tumors ("in vivo" method), three candidate angiomiRs (miR-30b, miR-1981, and miR-707) were significantly lower in TECs than NECs. In contrast, when ECs were isolated and cultured ("in vitro" method), three different candidate angiomiRs (miR-200a, miR-124 and miR-186) were significantly lower in TECs than NECs. Using two independent model systems for validation, we found miR-30b to be significantly reduced in TECs using freshly sorted ECs. Conversely, the in vitro discovered angiomiR candidates did not validate in these model systems, suggesting that TECs grown in vitro may not maintain relevant angiomiR profiles or serve as an adequate method for molecular profiling. Our findings demonstrate that angiomiR expression patterns are impacted by isolation methods. Instead of relying on ECs cultured in vitro, we suggest careful validation studies of cells freshly collected from tumors before determining whether a miRNA is a bona fide angiomiR.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.2%
3
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.3%
5
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
6
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
7
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
8
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
11
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
12
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
13
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
16
Angiogenesis
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.1%
18
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Molecular Cancer Research
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Molecular Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
25
FEBS Open Bio
31 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
26
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
27
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
28
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
30
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%