Back

Transcriptome-Driven Constraint-Based Modelling Reveals Metabolic Targets for Ovarian Cancer

Meeson, K. E.; McGrail, J.; Schwartz, J.-M.; Taylor, S. S.

2025-06-24 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.06.24.661329 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Constraint-based modelling (CBM) is a powerful computational approach that reconstructs cellular metabolism by integrating omics data with genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs), enabling in silico hypothesis generation and genetic engineering studies. Advances in high-throughput omics technologies and the complete mapping of the human genome have expanded the application of CBM to human systems. Given that altered metabolism is a hallmark of cancer, this disease represents an ideal context for developing and applying CBM workflows. Despite the presence of well-characterised metabolic signatures and vulnerabilities in ovarian cancer, this tumour type remains under-explored within the CBM field. Meanwhile, the limited efficacy of current therapies and the frequent emergence of chemoresistance underscore the need for novel, mechanism-based approaches to therapeutic discovery. In this study, we constructed ovarian cancer-specific metabolic models using an omics integration algorithm that incorporates transcriptomic data in a way that is directed by experimental growth measurements. Simulations identified multiple candidate molecules predicted to influence cancer cell proliferation. Among these, triosephosphate isomerase 1 (TPI1) was selected for experimental validation based on qualitative prioritisation criteria. Notably, model predictions were supported by RNA sequencing and proliferation assays, implicating TPI1 in ovarian cancer cell growth. Our results provide novel insights into the metabolic dependencies of ovarian cancer and demonstrate a multi-omics CBM workflow that may be broadly applicable for uncovering therapeutic vulnerabilities in other malignancies.

Published in Cancer & Metabolism · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.