Metabolic modeling reveals determinants of synbiotic efficacy in a human intervention trial.
Quinn-Bohmann, N.; Gibbons, S. M.
Show abstract
Prebiotic, probiotic, and combined (synbiotic) interventions often show variable outcomes across individuals, driven by complex interactions between introduced biotics, the endogenous microbiota, and the host diet. Predicting individual-specific success or failure of probiotic and prebiotic therapies remains a major challenge. Here, we leverage microbial community-scale metabolic models (MCMMs) to forecast probiotic engraftment and microbiota-mediated short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production in response to probiotic and prebiotic interventions. Using data from two clinical trials, testing a five-strain probiotic combined with the prebiotic inulin designed to improve metabolic health and an eight-strain probiotic designed to treat recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections, respectively, we show that MCMM-predicted engraftment largely agrees with measurements, achieving 75-80% accuracy. Engraftment probabilities varied across taxa, with Akkermansia muciniphila and Bifidobacterium infantis showing higher predicted and observed engraftment than the clostridial strains. MCMMs captured treatment-driven shifts in predicted SCFA production, and higher model-predicted growth rates of A. muciniphila were negatively associated with glucose AUC in the synbiotic trial, providing clues about the mechanisms underlying treatment efficacy. Finally, extending these models to a longitudinal cohort undergoing a healthy diet and lifestyle intervention revealed substantial inter-individual variability in predicted responses to increasing dietary fiber, which were significantly associated with baseline-to-follow-up changes in cardiometabolic health markers. Finally, our simulation results suggested that personalized prebiotic selection may further enhance probiotic efficacy. Together, these findings demonstrate the potential of metabolic modeling to guide personalized microbiome-mediated interventions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High fiber, whole foods dietary intervention alters the human gut microbiome but not fecal short-chain fatty acids 94%
- Identifying Clostridioides difficile-inhibiting gut commensals using culturomics, phenotyping, and combinatorial community assembly 94%
- Consumption of a Western-style diet modulates the response of the murine gut microbiome to ciprofloxacin 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A standardized gnotobiotic mouse model harboring a minimal 15-member mouse gut microbiota recapitulates SOPF/SPF phenotypes 94%
- Predicting metabolite response to dietary intervention using deep learning 94%
- The gut microbiome and early-life growth in a population with high prevalence of stunting 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolite-based dietary supplementation in human type 1 diabetes is associated with microbiota and immune modulation 95%
- Microbiota responses to different prebiotics are conserved within individuals and associated with habitual fiber intake 95%
- Metabolic modeling of microbial communities in the chicken ceca reveals a landscape of competition and co-operation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gut Microbiome Predicts Clinically Important Improvement in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis 92%
- Interactions between the gut microbiome and host gene regulation in cystic fibrosis 89%
- Human reference gut microbiome comprising 5,414 prokaryotic species, including newly assembled genomes from under-represented Asian metagenomes 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-strain fermented milk promotes gut microbiota recovery after Helicobacter pylori therapy: a randomised, controlled trial 92%
- Inflammatory dietary potential is associated with vitamin depletion and gut microbial dysbiosis in early pregnancy 91%
- Effect of a novel food rich in miraculin on the intestinal microbiome of malnourished patients with cancer and dysgeusia 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.