Back

Percutaneous Spinal Stimulation to Enhance Gait and Alleviate Functional Impairments in Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study

Jahanian, O.; Asp, A. J.; Gill, M. L.; Veith, D. D.; Fernandez, K. A.; Hogen, C. A.; Mills, C. J.; Thoreson, A. R.; Solinsky, R.; Kaufman, K. R.; Grahn, P. J.; Zhao, K. D.; Tobin, W. O.

2025-06-24 neurology
10.1101/2025.06.23.25329591 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and potential efficacy of percutaneous spinal stimulation (epidural stimulation, ES) combined with task-specific training to reduce spasticity and improve gait and balance in individuals with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). MethodsTwo men with progressive MS (EDSS 6.5) underwent ES lead implantation targeting the lower spinal cord, followed by one month of rehabilitation involving 12 ES-assisted training sessions. Assessments included instrumented gait analysis, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), pendulum test, and static balance testing performed at baseline, and at end of study with ES-Off and ES-On conditions. ResultsParticipant 1, with spastic hemiparetic gait, demonstrated improved lower extremity joint kinematics and muscle activation during gait, reduced knee extensor spasticity, and enhanced functional movement patterns with ES-On. Participant 2, with significant paraparesis and minimal spasticity, showed limited gait changes but experienced marked improvements in static balance, particularly under eyes-closed conditions. No adverse events were reported. ConclusionThis pilot study suggests that ES paired with task-specific training may enhance gait and balance in individuals with progressive MS. Responses varied based on impairment profiles, underscoring the importance of individualized ES parameter tuning. These findings warrant further investigation of ES as a therapeutic option for motor impairments in MS.

Published in Multiple Sclerosis Journal – Experimental, Translational and Clinical · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.