Assessing accuracy and legitimacy of multimodal large language models on Japan Diagnostic Radiology Board Examination

PurposeTo assess and compare the accuracy and legitimacy of multimodal large language models (LLMs) on the Japan Diagnostic Radiology Board Examination (JDRBE). Materials and methodsThe dataset comprised questions from JDRBE 2021, 2023, and 2024, with ground-truth answers established through consensus among multiple board-certified diagnostic radiologists. Questions without associated images and those lacking unanimous agreement on answers were excluded. Eight LLMs were evaluated: GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-4.5, GPT-4.1, o3, o4-mini, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, and Gemini 2.5 Pro. Each model was evaluated under two conditions: with inputting images (vision) and without (text-only). Performance differences between the conditions were assessed using McNemars exact test. Two diagnostic radiologists (with 2 and 18 years of experience) independently rated the legitimacy of responses from four models (GPT-4 Turbo, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, o3, and Gemini 2.5 Pro) using a five-point Likert scale, blinded to model identity. Legitimacy scores were analyzed using Friedmans test, followed by pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm correction. ResultsThe dataset included 233 questions. Under the vision condition, o3 achieved the highest accuracy at 72%, followed by o4-mini (70%) and Gemini 2.5 Pro (70%). Under the text-only condition, o3 topped the list with an accuracy of 67%. Addition of image input significantly improved the accuracy of two models (Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-4.5), but not the others. Both o3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro received significantly higher legitimacy scores than GPT-4 Turbo and Claude 3.7 Sonnet from both raters. ConclusionRecent multimodal LLMs, particularly o3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro, have demonstrated remarkable progress on JDRBE questions, reflecting their rapid evolution in diagnostic radiology. Secondary abstract Eight multimodal large language models were evaluated on the Japan Diagnostic Radiology Board Examination. OpenAIs o3 and Google DeepMinds Gemini 2.5 Pro achieved high accuracy rates (72% and 70%) and received good legitimacy scores from human raters, demonstrating steady progress.