Back

Effect of Sevelamer versus Bifidobacterium longum on Insulin Sensitivity in Subjects with Obesity

Semwal, M. K.; Baeuerle, E.; Nie, J.; Zhang, N.; Liang, H.; Ganapathy, V.; Sathavarodom, N.; Fernandez, R.; Wang, C.-P.; Espinoza, S.; Dong, Q.; Yang, Z.; Kostic, A.; Musi, N.

2025-06-24 endocrinology
10.1101/2025.06.23.25327556 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo test whether interventions with putative lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-lowering effects including sevelamer and a synbiotic (Bifidobacterium longum+oligofructose) improve insulin sensitivity in subjects with obesity. MethodsWe randomized 22 lean and 28 human subjects with obesity to receive sevelamer, synbiotic, or placebo orally for 4 weeks. Peripheral insulin sensitivity was measured with an insulin clamp. Plasma cholesterol, endotoxemia markers, intestinal permeability, stool bacterial taxonomic content and plasma metabolites also were assessed. ResultsAt baseline, subjects with obesity had lower insulin sensitivity and elevated plasma LDL-C concentrations. Sevelamer improved insulin sensitivity and lowered LDL-C in these subjects. Intestinal enrichment of Bifidobacterium longum had no effect on insulin sensitivity or lipids in either group. Markers of endotoxemia and intestinal permeability did not change with any intervention. Plasma metabolomics revealed that sevelamer increases several metabolites, many of them previously linked with positive changes in glucose and lipid metabolism, including biliary acids, amino acids (citrulline, betaine), NAD+ precursors (trigonelline) and xenobiotics (genistein, umbelliferone). ConclusionSevelamer improves insulin sensitivity and LDL-C in subjects with obesity, but these effects are independent of changes in circulating LPS. Sevelamer increases the levels of multiple metabolites that collectively may mediate improvements in glucose homeostasis and lipids caused by this drug.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.