Back

Antibiotic use and outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations

Loiars, M. J.; Morrison, H.; Linn, E. C.; Gonzalez, A.

2025-06-22 infectious diseases
10.1101/2025.06.20.25330010 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to evaluate if there is a difference in clinical worsening for patients receiving different antibiotics for COPD exacerbations. MethodsThis was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were: adults whose indication for antibiotics was a COPD exacerbation; who received azithromycin, doxycycline, levofloxacin, or a beta-lactam for more than 48 hours; who received no more than 48 hours of combination initial antibiotics; and who were discharged with certain bronchodilators. The primary endpoint was clinical worsening defined by antibiotic/steroid escalation/addition. Secondary endpoints included days of antibiotic therapy, length of stay and 30-day readmissions. ResultsA total of 2,390 patients were identified for review with 114 patients included and 1,054 patients excluded. Patients were screened in reverse chronological order using quota convenience sampling. Clinical worsening occurred in 29% of azithromycin patients, 23% of doxycycline patients, 19% of levofloxacin patients, and 24% of beta-lactam patients; however, a Pearson Chi-Square test ({chi}2 = 0.911, p = 0.8227) showed no statistically significant association between antibiotic group and likelihood of escalation. Secondary outcomes that were statistically significant included the average cumulative inpatient and outpatient prednisone milligram equivalents with beta-lactams compared to azithromycin, which was 252 milligrams higher (p = 0.0161). Days of therapy (DOT) was statistically different for azithromycin compared to all of the other antibiotics. ConclusionThis study concluded that there were no associated differences between groups for clinical worsening. This study showed a trend that narrow spectrum antibiotics, such as doxycycline and azithromycin, have similar outcomes as more broad spectrum antibiotics.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.