Olfactory, gustatory and trigeminal changes in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: an exploratory prospective cohort study.
van Elst, J. M.; Tami, A.; Vincenti-Gonzalez, M. F.; Wold, K. I.; Veloo, L. A.; van der Gun, B. T.; Jager-Wittenaar, H.; Reyners, A. K. L.; de Haan, J. J.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThis study aimed to longitudinally assess the prevalence and characteristics of olfactory, gustatory, and trigeminal changes, and the impact of these changes on daily life and quality of life (QoL) in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients. MethodsThree weeks after confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis, non-hospitalized adult participants enrolled in the COVID HOME study consented to complete a questionnaire by phone on the presence, characteristics, and impact on daily life and QoL of olfactory, gustatory and/or trigeminal changes. Participants reporting taste and/or smell changes completed the same questionnaire at three months and, when still present, at six months. ResultsThe questionnaire was completed by 94/117 participants included in this study three weeks after COVID-19 diagnosis. The 43 participants with smell and/or taste changes completed the questionnaire at three months, and 19 at six months. Of the 94 participants, 56% were female and the median age was 43 [IQR 29-55] years. At three weeks post-infection, olfactory, gustatory, and trigeminal changes were reported by 40 (43%), 37 (39%), and 8 (9%) participants, respectively. During follow-up, olfactory, gustatory, and trigeminal changes were reported by 17 (40%), 14 (33%), and 3 (7%) at three months, and 12 (63%), 9 (47%), and 1 (5%) participants at six months, respectively. Most patients reported an impact of sensory changes on daily life and QoL, mostly describing it as a bit or quite a bit. However, impact did not differ between time points and most participants reported taking no action to cope with these changes. Participants with reported sensory alterations were most interested in professional help at six months. ConclusionsIn non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, the reported prevalence of olfactory, gustatory and trigeminal changes is higher three weeks after infection. Most patients report modest impact on daily life and QoL due to these sensory changes, and a subgroup reported a profound effect.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Persisting Chemosensory Impairments in 366 Healthcare Workers Following COVID-19: An 11-Month Follow-up 96%
- High prevalence of long-term psychophysical olfactory dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 96%
- Chemosensory dysfunctions induced by COVID-19 can persist up to 7 months: A study of over 700 healthcare workers 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- High prevalence of olfactory disorders 18 months after contracting COVID-19 95%
- Influence of age and gender on taste function of healthy subjects 93%
- Early intervention with a glycerol throat spray containing cold-adapted cod trypsin after self-diagnosis of the common cold: a randomised prospective, parallel group and single-blind methods trial (Glycerol-cod trypsin spray in common cold) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- More than 50 Long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Reduced Olfactory Bulb Volume Accompanies Smelling Dysfunction After Mild SARS-CoV-2 Infection: The Hamburg City Health Study COVID Program 92%
- Is Kambo psychoactive? Acute and subacute effects of the secretion of the Giant Maki Frog (Phyllomedusa bicolor) on human consciousness. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and Safety of Habitual Consumption of a Food Supplement Containing Miraculin in Malnourished Cancer Patients: the CLINMIR Pilot Study 92%
- Effect of a novel food rich in miraculin on the intestinal microbiome of malnourished patients with cancer and dysgeusia 91%
- Multi-strain fermented milk promotes gut microbiota recovery after Helicobacter pylori therapy: a randomised, controlled trial 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.