Speak or shout? Nonverbal vocalizations ensure rapid detection of emotions in vocal communication
Pell, M. D.; Cui, H.; Mori, Y.; Jiang, X.
Show abstract
Human vocal expressions of emotion can be expressed nonverbally, through vocalizations such as shouts or laughter, or speakers can embed emotional meanings in language by modifying their tone of voice ("prosody"). Is there evidence that nonverbal expressions promote "better" (i.e., more accurate, faster) recognition of emotions than speech, and what is the impact of language experience? Our study investigated these questions using a cross-cultural gating paradigm, in which Chinese and Arab listeners (n=25/group) judged the emotion communicated by acoustic events that varied in duration (200 milliseconds to the full expression) and form (vocalizations or prosody expressed in listeners native, second or foreign language). Accuracy was higher for vocalizations overall, but listeners were markedly more efficient to form stable categorical representations of the speakers emotion from vocalizations (M = 417ms) than native prosody (M = 765ms). Language experience enhanced recognition of emotional prosody expressed by native/ingroup speakers for some listeners (Chinese) but not all (Arab), emphasizing the dynamic interplay of socio-cultural factors and stimulus quality on prosody recognition which occurs over a more sustained time window. Our data show that vocalizations are functionally suited to build robust, rapid impressions of a speakers emotion state unconstrained by the listeners linguistic cultural background.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptual awareness of near-threshold tones scales gradually with auditory cortex activity and pupil dilation 93%
- Auditory neural tracking reflects target enhancement but not distractor suppression in a psychophysically augmented continuous-speech paradigm 92%
- Brain-to-brain coupling forecasts future joint action outcomes 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.