Back

Preserved cerebellar functions despite structural degeneration in older adults

de Witte, A.; Matthijs, A.; Parrell, B.; Mantini, D.; Gooijers, J.; Orban de Xivry, J.-J.

2025-07-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.06.18.660418 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Aging is frequently perceived negatively due to its association with the decline of various brain and bodily functions. While it is evident that motor abilities deteriorate with age, it is incorrect to assume that all aspects of movement execution are equally affected. The cerebellum, a brain region that is closely involved in motor control among other functions, undergoes clear structural changes with aging. While several studies suggest that cerebellar degeneration causes age-related motor control deficits, other studies suggest that the cerebellum might act as a motor reserve and compensate for its structural degeneration, leaving cerebellar motor function intact despite cerebellar degeneration. The present study aims at thoroughly investigating the impact of age on cerebellar function across an array of tasks and domains. We investigated cerebellar motor and cognitive functions across the lifespan by examining 50 young adults (20-35 years), 80 older adults (55-70 years), and 30 older-old adults (>80 years). Participants completed a test battery comprising seven motor control tasks and one cognitive task, each designed to probe cerebellar function through different paradigms. This multi-task approach allowed for a comprehensive evaluation of performance patterns, providing a balanced perspective on cerebellar function across the different age groups. In addition, we analyzed outcomes from the same tasks that, while related to movement, were not specifically linked to cerebellar function. Structural magnetic resonance imaging was also conducted to assess whether cerebellar atrophy was present in the older and older-old groups compared to the young. Our results revealed that, despite age-related cerebellar degeneration, cerebellar functions in older adults remained intact compared to young adults, even in adults above 80 years old. In contrast, the sensorimotor measures that were not directly linked to cerebellar function exhibited a clear pattern of decline in older adults, and were further deteriorated in the older-old adults compared to the older adults. These findings indicate that cerebellar motor control functions remain largely preserved with age, providing compelling evidence that the cerebellum possesses a remarkable degree of functional resilience and redundancy. This suggests that cerebellar circuits may be uniquely equipped to preserve function despite structural degeneration.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
53.2%
50% of probability mass above
2
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
3
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
6
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
7
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
8
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
9
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
11
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
12
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
13
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
14
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
16
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Aging
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
19
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Biological Psychology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
24
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%