Back

Broad epigenetic shifts in the aging Drosophila retina contribute to its altered rhythmic transcriptome.

McGovern, S. E.; Meng, G.; Marlin, M. N.; Pruitt, S. A.; Weake, V. M.

2025-06-17 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.06.17.660160 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Alterations in biological rhythms are a common feature of aging, and disruption of circadian rhythms can exacerbate age-associated pathologies. The retina is critical for detecting light for both vision and for transmitting time-of-day information to the brain, synchronizing rhythms throughout the body. Disruption of circadian rhythms by manipulating the molecular clock leads to premature retinal degeneration in flies and mice, and gene expression rhythms are disrupted in models of age-associated ocular disease. Despite this, it is unknown how or why the gene expression rhythms of the retina change with age. Here, we show that [~]70% of the Drosophila transcriptome is rhythmically expressed throughout the diurnal cycle, with [~]40% of genes showing altered rhythms with age. These transcriptome-wide changes in aging photoreceptors are accompanied by shifts in the rhythmic patterns of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) occupancy, histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methylation, and chromatin accessibility, without major changes in occupancy of the circadian clock transcription factors Clock (Clk) and Cycle (Cyc). Instead, aging decreases genome-wide levels of several different histone methyl marks including H3K4 methylation, whose relative levels across the day correlate with the phase of rhythmic gene expression. Moreover, individual knockdown of the three H3K4 methyltransferases in young photoreceptors results in massive disruptions to rhythmic gene expression that resemble those observed during aging. We conclude that there are broad epigenetic shifts in the aging retina, including decreased histone methylation, that contribute to changes in biological rhythms even in the presence of a robust molecular circadian clock.

Published in Aging Cell (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.