Back

Geometric morphometric analysis of facial sexual dimorphism in a contemporary sample : An application to sex prediction of ancient human remains

Legros, J.; Borde, P.; Savall, F.; Dedouit, F.; Crubezy, E.; Telmon, N.

2025-06-20 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.06.17.660135 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Focusing on craniofacial bones, this study investigates morphological variation related to sexual dimorphism in order to deepen our understanding of human biological diversity and to provide new data from a contemporary reference sample. Accordingly, the research was guided by three objectives (i) identify the facial regions exhibiting the greatest sexual dimorphism using landmark-based geometric morphometric method; (ii) evaluate the reliability of discriminant models based on these dimorphic regions; and (iii) conduct exploratory analyses to assign sex classification probabilities to ancient subjects using the discriminant models derived from a contemporary reference sample. The reference sample comprised 44 skulls from subjects of known sex who died in 2024. The ancient sample included 4 skulls recovered from the Grotte de La Medecine (France), attributed to the chalcolithic period. Fourteen facial landmarks were digitized using 3DSlicer. Generalized Procrustes Analysis was performed to extract shape variables and standardized coordinates for statistical analysis. Thin -Plate Spline transformations quantified and visualized deformation amplitudes between the female and male shapes. Landmarks in the orbital showed the highest deformation amplitudes. Goodall F-test comparing male and female shapes across three facial regions revealed significant sexual dimorphism only in the orbital region and the global facial shape. Discriminant analysis demonstrated that the orbital region provided the highest classification accuracy (88.6%) compared to the global facial region (72.7%). The discriminant models yielded high probabilities of male and female sex classification for the ancient subjects. Using a reproducible method, comparable levels of accuracy to those reported in the scientific literature were achieved despite a relatively modest sample size. These findings further confirm the significant role of the orbital region in human craniofacial sexual dimorphism.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.7%
2
Journal of Anatomy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Evolutionary Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.1%
4
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
5
The Anatomical Record
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
8
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
14
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
18
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Primates
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%