Deep Learning-Based Risk Prediction Model for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Long-Term Breast Cancer Survivors
Oh, S. N.; Shim, J. Y.; Lee, Y.-J.; Lee, J.-W.
Show abstract
BackgroundClinical practice guidelines recommend cardiovascular toxicity risk restratification including evaluation of new cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular diseases 5 years after cancer therapy in adult cancer survivors. We aimed to develop prediction models for the risk of 10-year cardiovascular complications in five-year breast cancer survivors. MethodsWe used the Korean National Health Insurance Service databases between 2005 and 2021, including 5,131 five-year female breast cancer survivors diagnosed in 2006. The study population was randomly split in a 4:1 ratio into the derivation and validation cohort. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at any time before the final follow-up at 10 years. We developed a deep learning survival model (DeepSurv) and compared its performance with traditional Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model using the same dataset. Model performance was assessed by time-dependent concordance (Ctd) index. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) was used to assess feature importance. ResultsIn the validation cohort, the DeepSurv and CPH model yielded Ctd index values of 0.738 (95% CI, 0.712-0.779) and 0.733 (95% CI, 0.649-0.777), respectively. In SHAP analysis, age, history of stroke, dyslipidemia, anthracycline use, and aromatase inhibitor therapy ranked highly in both models. ConclusionsA deep learning survival model that incorporates both conventional and breast cancer treatment-related cardiovascular risk factors outperformed traditional regression model in predicting 10-year MACEs among individual five-year breast cancer survivors.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Heart disease mortality in cancer survivors: A population-based study in Japan 92%
- Artificial intelligence of arterial Doppler waveforms to predict major adverse outcomes among patients evaluated for peripheral artery disease 92%
- Association between prostate cancer and myocardial infarction management and post-infarction outcomes: A Norwegian registry study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 93%
- The Impact of Variance in Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase-1 Expression on Breast Cancer Prognosis is Stratified by Clinical and Anthropometric Factors 93%
- Actionable absolute risk prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a behavior-management approach based on data from 464,547 UK Biobank participants 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a cardiovascular diseases risk prediction model for Chinese males (CVDMCM) 93%
- Predicting long-term prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a prospective nested case-control analysis for county-level health services 92%
- Supervised exercise training in patients with cancer during anthracycline-based chemotherapy to mitigate cardiotoxicity – a randomized controlled trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can machine learning improve risk prediction of incident hypertension? An internal method comparison and external validation of the Framingham risk model using HUNT Study data 92%
- Pan-cancer analyses of the associations between 109 pre-existing conditions and cancer treatment patterns across 19 adult cancers 91%
- Genome-wide investigation of gene-cancer associations for the prediction of novel therapeutic targets in oncology 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.