CEREBLEED: Automated quantification and severity scoring of intracranial hemorrhage on non-contrast CT
Cepeda, S.; Esteban-Sinovas, O.; Arrese, I.; Sarabia, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundIntracranial hemorrhage (ICH), whether spontaneous or traumatic, is a neurological emergency with high morbidity and mortality. Accurate assessment of severity is essential for neurosurgical decision-making. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a fully automated, deep learning-based tool for the standardized assessment of ICH severity, based on the segmentation of the hemorrhage and intracranial structures, and the computation of an objective severity index. MethodsNon-contrast cranial CT scans from patients with spontaneous or traumatic ICH were retrospectively collected from public datasets and a tertiary care center. Deep learning models were trained to segment hemorrhages and intracranial structures. These segmentations were used to compute a severity index reflecting bleeding burden and mass effect through volumetric relationships. Segmentation performance was evaluated on a hold-out test cohort. In a prospective cohort, the severity index was assessed in relation to expert-rated CT severity, clinical outcomes, and the need for urgent neurosurgical intervention. ResultsA total of 1,110 non-contrast cranial CT scans were analyzed, 900 from the retrospective cohort and 200 from the prospective evaluation cohort. The binary segmentation model achieved a median Dice score of 0.90 for total hemorrhage. The multilabel model yielded Dice scores ranging from 0.55 to 0.94 across hemorrhage subtypes. The severity index significantly correlated with expert-rated CT severity (p < 0.001), the modified Rankin Scale (p = 0.007), and the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (p = 0.039), and independently predicted the need for urgent surgery (p < 0.001). A threshold [~]300 was identified as a decision point for surgical management (AUC = 0.83). ConclusionWe developed a fully automated and openly accessible pipeline for the analysis of non-contrast cranial CT in intracranial hemorrhage. It computes a novel index that objectively quantifies hemorrhage severity and is significantly associated with clinically relevant outcomes, including the need for urgent neurosurgical intervention.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tractography-Pathology Correlations in Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study 94%
- The Therapy Intensity Level scale for traumatic brain injury: clinimetric assessment on neuro-monitored patients across 52 European intensive care units 93%
- Comparison of common outcome measures for assessing independence in patients diagnosed with disorders of consciousness: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model for identification of intracranial hemorrhage subtypes on computed tomography of the head 96%
- Computed tomography perfusion parameters predictive of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with cerebral large vessel occlusion 92%
- Recovery of intrinsic cognitive weakness in successive processing after bypass surgery for pediatric moyamoya disease 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on Neurosurgery Written Board Examinations 91%
- Safety and efficacy of management for intraprocedural rupture during endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms 91%
- Low and Borderline Ankle Brachial Index is Associated with Intracranial Aneurysms – a Retrospective Cohort Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep neural networks allow expert-level brain meningioma detection, segmentation and improvement of current clinical practice 96%
- Does contrast-enhancement improve visualisation of lenticulostriate arteries in cerebral small vessel disease using time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 7 Tesla? 93%
- The utility of MRI radiological biomarkers in determining intracranial pressure 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.