Effects of Pycnogenol(R) in post-COVID-19 condition (PYCNOVID): A single-center, placebo controlled, quadruple-blind, randomized trial
Kopp, J.; Kuenzi, L.; Rueegg, S.; Braun, J.; Rasi, M.; Anagnostopoulos, A.; Puhan, M. A.; Fehr, J. S.; Radtke, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundPost-COVID-19 condition (PCC) remains a public health challenge with limited treatment options. ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of Pycnogenol(R), a French maritime pine bark extract with anti-inflammatory and antioxidative properties, versus placebo on patient-reported health status in individuals with PCC. DesignSingle-center, placebo-controlled, quadruple-blind, randomized trial. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05890534 SettingGerman-speaking Switzerland. ParticipantsAdults with PCC with at least one of the following symptoms: fatigue, post-exertional malaise, dyspnea, or brain fog. InterventionDaily dose of 200 mg Pycnogenol(R) (50 mg capsules four times daily) or placebo for 12 weeks. MeasurementsThe primary outcome was self-reported health status (EQ-VAS). Secondary outcomes included symptoms, quality of life, exercise capacity, physical activity and blood biomarkers. ResultsBetween June 14, 2023, and July 5, 2024, 153 participants were randomized to receive Pycnogenol(R) (n=75) or placebo (n=78). Participants reported persisting symptoms for a median duration of 101 weeks. Unadjusted median EQ-VAS increased by 5.4 units and 7.9 units in the in the Pycnogenol(R) and placebo groups, respectively, with no difference observed between the groups ({beta}=0.54, 95% CI -3.45 to 4.54, p=0.79). 31 adverse events occurred in the Pycnogenol(R) group (11 probably related) and 18 in the placebo group (9 probably related). Three serious adverse events were reported, all unrelated to the study products. No between group differences were observed in secondary endpoints. LimitationThe results may not be generalizable to individuals newly experiencing PCC. ConclusionPycnogenol(R) (200 mg daily) did not improve health status compared to placebo over 12 weeks in PCC. Both groups showed clinically relevant improvements, suggesting non-therapeutic effects. Primary funding sourceHorphag Research, Switzerland.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Supporting Respiratory Epithelia and Lowering Inflammation to Effectively Treat Common Cold Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Safety and effectiveness of RBD-specific polyclonal equine F(ab′)2 fragments for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe Covid-19 disease: a retrospective cohort study 94%
- STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: a structured protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- One year health outcomes associated with systemic corticosteroids for COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort study 91%
- Early prone positioning does not improve the outcome of patients with mild pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2: results from an open-label, randomized controlled trial (the EPCoT Study) 91%
- Limited recovery from post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) at eight months in a prospective cohort 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dietary sulfur amino acid restriction in humans with overweight and obesity: a translational randomized controlled trial 90%
- The causal effect of serum vitamin D concentration on COVID-19 susceptibility, severity and hospitalization traits: a Mendelian randomization study 89%
- Genetic Risk Factors for Severe and Fatigue Dominant Long COVID and Commonalities with ME/CFS Identified by Combinatorial Analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Three month FVC change: a trial endpoint for IPF based on individual participant data meta-analysis 91%
- Domiciliary high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for stable hypercapnic COPD patients: a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial 89%
- A MUC5B gene polymorphism, rs35705950-T, confers protective effects in COVID-19 infection 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.