Data dashboard to support meta-analyses on influenza vaccine effectiveness across regions, influenza seasons and outcomes
Hendrickx, D.; Rice, K. L.; Baggen, H.; Frallicciardi, J.; Carvalho Moreira de Mello, J.; Julg, B.; van den Biggelaar, A. H. J.; Goudsmit, J.; Beukenhorst, A. L.
Show abstract
Evaluating influenza vaccine effectiveness is essential for identifying gaps in influenza prevention strategies. We developed an open-source dashboard-ready dataset with vaccine effectiveness data from 45 index countries in the inter-pandemic period between 2011 and 2019, based on a systematic literature review. We show how it can be used to estimate pooled vaccine effectiveness using fixed and/or random-effects meta-analyses. The full dataset contains 9,632 vaccine effectiveness estimates from 239 peer-reviewed studies. Individual data points are available on vaccine valency, type, and dose. The meta-analyses dataset can be subset by model, geographic region, influenza season, measure (adjusted, unadjusted), outcome (lab-confirmed infection, influenza-like illness, influenza-associated complications) age groups, comorbidity- or age-based risk groups, influenza type, and medical attendance type. As an example, we used a subset (with data from 2,128,431 participants) of this data to calculate the fixed effects pooled vaccine effectiveness for laboratory-confirmed influenza, which was 39.4% (for all). Vaccine effectiveness was lowest in the elderly (65+: 27.4%) compared to the general population; against A/H3N2 (23.9%) compared to A/H1N1 (49.0%) or B (46.7%); and in 2014, when there was mismatch between the circulating A/H3N2 strain and vaccine antigen. Our open-source datasets enable policy makers and researchers to assess vaccine effectiveness in different regions and contexts. Given the notably low vaccine effectiveness for the elderly, complementary strategies to further reduce the yearly worldwide burden of influenza infections are needed.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Meta-Analysis of Influenza Vaccination Following Correspondence: Considerations for COVID-19 94%
- Receipt of COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines in California (USA) during the 2021-2022 influenza season 94%
- Assessment of Potential Adverse Events Following the 2022–2023 Seasonal Influenza Vaccines Among U.S. Adults Aged 65 Years and Older 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of inactivated and Ad5-nCoV COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA. 2 variant infection, severe illness, and death 94%
- Potential health and economic impact of paediatric vaccination using next generation influenza vaccines in Kenya: a modelling study 94%
- Age and product dependent vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation among adults in Norway: a national cohort study, July – November 2021 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of vaccination on preventing long COVID in the Omicron era: a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Effectiveness of an Inactivated Covid-19 Vaccine with Homologous and Heterologous Boosters against Omicron in Brazil 94%
- Waning Effectiveness of the Third Dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population immunity of natural infection, primary-series vaccination, and booster vaccination in Qatar during the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study 93%
- Real-world Effectiveness and Causal Mediation Study of BNT162b2 on Long COVID Risks in Children and Adolescents 92%
- Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Recombinant Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: Interim Results of a Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1/2 Trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antivirals for post-exposure prophylaxis of influenza: a systematic review and network meta-analysis 95%
- Antivirals for treatment of severe influenza: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 95%
- Immunogenicity and safety of fractional doses of yellow fever vaccines: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.