Back

Social and private value created through commercialization of Gilead Sciences' innovative medicines for Hepatitis C and HIV: a cross-sectional analysis

Chaves da Silva, P.; Conti, R. M.; Ledley, F.

2025-06-11 health policy
10.1101/2025.06.11.25329435 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesThis work assesses the value created for society and for private sector by Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Gilead) through commercialization of medicines for hepatitis C and HIV from 2012-2020. While Gilead has developed several groundbreaking medicines, the company has also been criticized for its drug pricing, patenting, and profits. This analysis posits the total value created by a medicine derives from the health benefit provided to those using these medicines. DesignCross-sectional analysis. Primary and Secondary outcome measuresHealth benefit from treatment for nine hepatitis C or HIV medicines (Quality-Adjusted Life Years [QALYs], $), number of individuals benefited, price paid, and Gilead Sciences financial report (10K). ResultsGileads product sales generated 15.1 million in health benefit measured using QALYs for 23.7 million people. Expressed in monetary terms, these products created a total health value of $744.8 billion (US: $168.0; global: $576.8). This produced a residual health value, net price paid, of $544.6 billion (US: $35.9; global: $508.7) including $418.6 billion from hepatitis C medicines (US: $62.4; global: $356.2) and $125.9 billion from HIV medicines (US: -$26.6; global: $152.5). Total social value (US + global) created was $613.6 billion including residual health value ($544.6 billion), R&D ($34.2 billion), job creation ($9.7 billion), and social payments ($25.1 billion). Total private value was $193.5 billion including shareholder value ($85.7 billion) and network value (payments to commercial firms, $107.8 billion). ConclusionsSocial and private value differed between US and global sales and among diseases. This analysis highlights the scale of the value that can be created by modern medicines and the commercialization of pharmaceutical products applied to unmet medical needs. Assessing value creation at product level may guide corporate strategies and inform policies to promote both profit and public purpose. Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LI"Total stakeholder value" approach considers the sum of value provided to different stakeholders C_LIO_LITotal health value measured from unit sales and health benefit to treated individuals C_LIO_LIAnalysis based on market data and financial reports of manufacturers applicable to business strategy and policy C_LIO_LIMethod applicable to assessing value created by individual drugs, classes of drugs, or companies C_LIO_LIHealth benefit measured in QALYs are subject to limitations of this metric C_LI MeSh Headings"Hepatitis C" [MeSh Terms], "HIV Infections" [MeSh Terms], "Quality-Adjusted Life Years" [MeSh Terms], "Private Sector" [MeSh Terms], "Public Sector" [MeSh Terms]

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.