Social and private value created through commercialization of Gilead Sciences' innovative medicines for Hepatitis C and HIV: a cross-sectional analysis
Chaves da Silva, P.; Conti, R. M.; Ledley, F.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThis work assesses the value created for society and for private sector by Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Gilead) through commercialization of medicines for hepatitis C and HIV from 2012-2020. While Gilead has developed several groundbreaking medicines, the company has also been criticized for its drug pricing, patenting, and profits. This analysis posits the total value created by a medicine derives from the health benefit provided to those using these medicines. DesignCross-sectional analysis. Primary and Secondary outcome measuresHealth benefit from treatment for nine hepatitis C or HIV medicines (Quality-Adjusted Life Years [QALYs], $), number of individuals benefited, price paid, and Gilead Sciences financial report (10K). ResultsGileads product sales generated 15.1 million in health benefit measured using QALYs for 23.7 million people. Expressed in monetary terms, these products created a total health value of $744.8 billion (US: $168.0; global: $576.8). This produced a residual health value, net price paid, of $544.6 billion (US: $35.9; global: $508.7) including $418.6 billion from hepatitis C medicines (US: $62.4; global: $356.2) and $125.9 billion from HIV medicines (US: -$26.6; global: $152.5). Total social value (US + global) created was $613.6 billion including residual health value ($544.6 billion), R&D ($34.2 billion), job creation ($9.7 billion), and social payments ($25.1 billion). Total private value was $193.5 billion including shareholder value ($85.7 billion) and network value (payments to commercial firms, $107.8 billion). ConclusionsSocial and private value differed between US and global sales and among diseases. This analysis highlights the scale of the value that can be created by modern medicines and the commercialization of pharmaceutical products applied to unmet medical needs. Assessing value creation at product level may guide corporate strategies and inform policies to promote both profit and public purpose. Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LI"Total stakeholder value" approach considers the sum of value provided to different stakeholders C_LIO_LITotal health value measured from unit sales and health benefit to treated individuals C_LIO_LIAnalysis based on market data and financial reports of manufacturers applicable to business strategy and policy C_LIO_LIMethod applicable to assessing value created by individual drugs, classes of drugs, or companies C_LIO_LIHealth benefit measured in QALYs are subject to limitations of this metric C_LI MeSh Headings"Hepatitis C" [MeSh Terms], "HIV Infections" [MeSh Terms], "Quality-Adjusted Life Years" [MeSh Terms], "Private Sector" [MeSh Terms], "Public Sector" [MeSh Terms]
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Extent and causes of the collapse in the registration of innovative medications in Lebanon: A mixed-methods analysis 91%
- Application of observational research methods to real-world studies for rare disease drugs: a scoping review protocol 91%
- Effect of common maintenance drugs on the risk and severity of COVID-19 in elderly patients 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnuipiravir in the treatment of mild/moderate COVID-19: results of a real-life study 90%
- The Societal Value of Vaccines: Expert-Based Conceptual Framework and Methods Using COVID-19 Vaccines as A Case Study 89%
- Comparative Effectiveness of the Bivalent (Original/Omicron BA.4/BA.5) mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines mRNA-1273.222 and BNT162b2 Bivalent in Adults With Underlying Medical Conditions in the United States 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Budget Impact Analysis Of The Introduction Of Ranibizumabs Biosimilar To The Jordanian Joint Procurement System. 91%
- Health Economic Burden of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia 89%
- Projecting the impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on the COVID-19 epidemic and social restoration in the United States: a mathematical modelling study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and Efficacy of Oral administrated Cepharanthine in Non-hospitalized, asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 patients: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial 90%
- Calibration of Two Validated SARS-CoV-2 Pseudovirus Neutralization Assays for COVID-19 Vaccine Evaluation 89%
- The molecular basis of the anticancer effect of statins 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Outpatient therapies for COVID-19: How do we choose? 93%
- Minimum manufacturing costs, national prices and estimated global availability of new repurposed therapies for COVID-19 92%
- Determining population-level allocation strategies for COVID-19 treatments in the United States using a quantitative framework, a case study using nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.