GXwasR: A Toolkit for Investigating Sex-Differentiated Genetic Effects on Complex Traits
Bose, B.; Bolstein, F.; Kim, J.; Winters, J.; Actkins, K.; Mayer, D.; Niarchou, M.; Congivaram, H. T. S.; Edwards, D. R. V.; Davis, L.; Stranger, B.
Show abstract
Many complex traits in humans exhibit sex differences. Recent advances in understanding context-specific genetic effects underscore the imperative for sex-aware genetic analyses to assess the role of sex in the genetic basis of human phenotypes. Despite increasing recognition of the importance of sex as a biological variable, current computational tools for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) lack functionality for performing nuanced sex-aware quality control and analysis. In response, we present GXwasR, a comprehensive R package that implements statistical genetic models for performing both GWAS and X-Chromosome-Wide Association Studies (XWAS). Designed for both sex-combined and sex-stratified analyses, GXwasR can account for unique features of chromosome X, including X-chromosome inactivation. Beyond enabling association analysis and meta-analysis, the tool has functions to a) test for sex differences in SNP-level genetic effects and heritability, b) assess genetic correlation, c) compute sex-aware polygenic risk scores (PRS), and d) support enhanced quality control protocols expressly designed for these purposes. GXwasR thus serves as a computational resource to enable investigations into the role of sex in the genetic basis of complex human phenotypes.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Summary statistics from large-scale gene-environment interaction studies for re-analysis and meta-analysis 94%
- Incorporating family disease history and controlling case-control imbalance for population based genetic association studies 94%
- MR Corge: Sensitivity analysis of Mendelian randomization based on the core gene hypothesis for polygenic exposures 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel method for an unbiased estimate of cross-ancestry genetic correlation using individual-level data 95%
- Improved analyses of GWAS summary statistics by reducing data heterogeneity and errors 94%
- Flashfm: A Flexible and Shared Information Fine-mapping Approach for Multiple Quantitative Traits 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.