Back

Robust immediate and limited long-term benefit of prism adaptation on spatial neglect: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of outcomes and predictors

Zhu, Y.; Quesque, F.; Nishida, D.; Jacquin-Courtois, S.; Luaute, J.; Chabanat, E.; Rode, G.; Rossetti, Y.

2025-06-10 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2025.06.09.25329277 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe first aim was to assess the immediate and long-term effects of prism adaptation (PA) on spatial neglect (SN) via meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The second aim was to identify potential predictive factors of PA efficacy. MethodsWe searched 4 databases up to March 2025 for RCTs comparing PA or PA+conventional vs. shamPA or shamPA+conventional or only conventional in participants with SN, and assessing behavioral or neuropsychological tests (such as Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) and Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT)). Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool and random-effects meta-analysis were used, and effect size was reported as Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) with 95%CI. ResultsOnly 10 RCTs (356 participants) could be included, 8 of them reporting CBS data and 6 for BIT. Immediate PA effects on SN showed a significant improvement for CBS between the PA group and control group (all studies with prism shift [&ge;]10{degrees}, WMD= -2.13, 95%CI: [-3.93, -0.33], P<0.05), while non-significance for BIT-C. Long-term benefit was not significant for CBS, while significant for BIT-C when the prism shift was [&ge;]10{degrees} (WMD= 12.37, 95%CI: [0.53, 24.21], P<0.05). Linear regressions showed non-significant predictive factors among the participant characteristics or PA intervention parameters. Subgroup analyses for CBS showed a significant immediate improvement in the larger total quantity of prism exposure (number of total trials x prism shift) subgroup (WMD= -2.73, 95%CI: [-5.01, -0.44], P<0.05), whereas subgroup with smaller total exposure showed non-significance. ConclusionEven with stringent inclusion criteria, robust effects of PA on SN were observed in the short-term CBS (all studies with prism shift [&ge;]10{degrees}), mainly derived from studies with total exposure [&ge;]11250{degrees}{middle dot}trials. A significant improvement for long-term BIT-C was observed when the prism shift was [&ge;]10{degrees} (n=2, with 4000{degrees}{middle dot}trials and 21600{degrees}{middle dot}trials). The total quantity of prism exposure ({degrees}{middle dot}trials) may be a useful predictive efficacy factor of efficacy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
26.3%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
7
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
9
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
11
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
17
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
19
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Aging
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
27
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
29
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%