Back

Therapeutic Potential of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in Long COVID: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sanal-Hayes, N.; Slade, K.; Mclaughlin, M.; Berry, E.; Swift, E.; Hayes, L. D.

2025-06-06 public and global health
10.1101/2025.06.05.25329096 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo synthesise quantitative evidence on the effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) as an intervention for individuals with long COVID/post-COVID syndrome. IntroductionAn estimated 65 million people worldwide meet the WHOs criteria for post-COVID-19 condition, a multisystem disorder with persistent symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Despite its global impact, effective treatments are limited. A recent review highlighted early but promising results from non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), though the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Given the expanding use of TMS in long COVID, a follow-up meta-analysis is needed to reflect recent developments. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy of TMS in treating post-COVID-19 symptoms. Inclusion criteriaThis review will include studies that investigate interventions involving TMSin individuals diagnosed with long COVID or post-COVID syndrome, limited to those published in the English language. Studies will be excluded if they do not involve rTMS as a therapeutic intervention, do not involve TMS at all, focus on populations other than those with long COVID or post-COVID condition, are review articles or case studies, or are not published in English. MethodsA comprehensive search will be conducted in CINAHL Ultimate, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Scopus using a strategy developed with the research team. Retrieved citations will be managed in Rayyan. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, followed by full-text screening and data extraction by two other independent reviewers. All stages will follow predefined, pilot-tested inclusion and exclusion criteria. Discrepancies will be resolved by a third reviewer or team discussion. Intra-rater reliability at both screening stages will be assessed using Cohens Kappa. Study characteristics and findings will be presented using both narrative synthesis and tabular formats. Review registrationhttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RE235

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.