Back

Therapeutic Potential of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in Long COVID: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sanal-Hayes, N.; Slade, K.; Mclaughlin, M.; Berry, E.; Swift, E.; Hayes, L. D.

2025-06-06 public and global health
10.1101/2025.06.05.25329096 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo synthesise quantitative evidence on the effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) as an intervention for individuals with long COVID/post-COVID syndrome. IntroductionAn estimated 65 million people worldwide meet the WHOs criteria for post-COVID-19 condition, a multisystem disorder with persistent symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Despite its global impact, effective treatments are limited. A recent review highlighted early but promising results from non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), though the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Given the expanding use of TMS in long COVID, a follow-up meta-analysis is needed to reflect recent developments. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy of TMS in treating post-COVID-19 symptoms. Inclusion criteriaThis review will include studies that investigate interventions involving TMSin individuals diagnosed with long COVID or post-COVID syndrome, limited to those published in the English language. Studies will be excluded if they do not involve rTMS as a therapeutic intervention, do not involve TMS at all, focus on populations other than those with long COVID or post-COVID condition, are review articles or case studies, or are not published in English. MethodsA comprehensive search will be conducted in CINAHL Ultimate, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Scopus using a strategy developed with the research team. Retrieved citations will be managed in Rayyan. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, followed by full-text screening and data extraction by two other independent reviewers. All stages will follow predefined, pilot-tested inclusion and exclusion criteria. Discrepancies will be resolved by a third reviewer or team discussion. Intra-rater reliability at both screening stages will be assessed using Cohens Kappa. Study characteristics and findings will be presented using both narrative synthesis and tabular formats. Review registrationhttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RE235

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.7%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.6%
3
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.6%
4
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
5
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
8
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
10
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
12
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
13
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
14
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
20
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Schizophrenia
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%