Back

Protists Exhibit Stronger and More Recent Oceanic Genetic Structure than Archaeplastida and Metazoa

Gonzalez-Miguens, R.; Galvez-Morante, A.; Torruella, G.; Berney, C.; Casacuberta, E.; Ruiz-Trillo, I.

2025-06-02 microbiology
10.1101/2025.06.02.657477 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The global distribution of biodiversity is shaped by a complex interplay of evolutionary history and ecological processes. While biogeographic patterns are well defined for animals and plants, the global distributions of protists remain unclear. A key question is whether protists follow the same broad biogeographic principles as macroscopic life. To address this, we compiled 88 marine COI metabarcoding studies performing population-genetic analyses across ocean basins. Our results reveal that most protist phyla exhibit pronounced genetic structure among oceans, a pattern exceeding that reported for Archaeplastida and Metazoa. This likely reflects recent, and potentially human-mediated, introductions, influencing protist dispersal and contemporary community assembly. By demonstrating that protist distributions are not historically cosmopolitan, our study supports the existence of common eukaryotic biogeographic patterns that transcend organismal size.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mSystems
● 394 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.1%
Similar papers in this journal
2
mBio
● 833 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.1%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.5%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 5%
5.3%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.3%
Similar papers in this journal
6
The ISME Journal
◐ 228 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
ISME Communications
◐ 120 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.4%
9
Microbial Genomics
● 225 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Microbiology Spectrum
● 469 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
11
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.3%
12
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.3%
13
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.1%
14
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
15
Science
● 477 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
Molecular Biology and Evolution
◐ 542 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Microbiome
○ 154 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
19
Environmental Microbiology
○ 133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
20
mSphere
● 302 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
21
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
● 339 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
23
BMC Biology
○ 265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
24
Molecular Ecology
○ 336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
Molecular Ecology Resources
○ 171 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
26
Virus Evolution
◐ 155 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
27
Current Biology
○ 665 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
28
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
29
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
● 393 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
30
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.