Associations of Lisinopril/Candesartan, Anti-CGRP Treatments vs. Topiramate on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Migraine
Wang, K.; Fenton, B. T.; Ney, J. P.; Dao, V. X.; Guirguis, A. B.; Schindler, E. A.; de Havenon, A.; Skanderson, M.; Anthony, S. E.; Burrone, L. J.; Sico, J. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundMigraine is a prevalent neurological condition associated with increased cardiovascular risk; however, the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying this association remains poorly understood, and the long-term cardiovascular effects of migraine preventive medications have yet to be determined. MethodsWe emulated two separate two-arm target trials comparing patients who initiated lisinopril/candesartan or anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (aCGRP) treatments versus those receiving topiramate for migraine prevention within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs between June 1, 2018 and September 30, 2024. The outcome was major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) including myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage (ICH/SAH) and all-cause mortality. Five-year cumulative incidences, risk differences, risk ratios and overall hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated. ResultsAmong 48,610 patients initiating lisinopril/candesartan (mean [SD] age, 52.3 [12.3] years; 18.9% women) and 25,635 initiating aCGRP treatment (mean [SD] age, 47.2 [12.2] years; 39.4% women), lisinopril/candesartan was associated with a higher risk of MACE (HR 1.21; 95%CI, 1.10-1.34), particularly MI (HR 1.28; 95%CI, 1.03-1.59). The MI risk was greater in patients without documented cardiovascular indications (HR 2.75; 95%CI, 2.01-3.77), patients aged <40 years (HR 3.18; 95%CI, 1.63-6.20), or with baseline systolic blood pressure <130 mm Hg (HR 1.86; 95%CI, 1.44-2.39). aCGRP use was associated with a reduced risk of MI (HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.62-1.02) and was not associated with ischemic stroke (HR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.84-1.49) or ICH/SAH (HR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.65-1.38). ConclusionsIn this retrospective cohort study, lisinopril/candesartan may increase cardiovascular risk among migraine patients, particularly those at low risk of atherosclerosis, while aCGRP treatment appears safe and potentially protective against MI. These findings suggest a role for neurogenic inflammation-mediated by CGRP and substance P-in migraine-associated, non-atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk. Future research is warranted.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetically Predicted IL-18 Inhibition and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Mendelian Randomization Study 94%
- Effects of catheter-based renal denervation in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Leveraging a genetic proxy to investigate the effects of lifelong cardiac sodium channel blockade 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of Second-line Antihyperglycemic Agents for Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Large-scale, Multinational, Federated Analysis of the LEGEND-T2DM Study 94%
- Lipid-Modulating Agents for Prevention or Treatment of COVID-19 in Randomized Trials 91%
- Antithrombotic Therapy in COVID-19: Systematic Summary of Ongoing or Completed Randomized Trials 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist in Large Vessel Occlusion Treated by Reperfusion Therapy: A Phase 2 Randomized Trial 94%
- Biomarker panels for improved risk prediction and enhanced biological insights in patients with atrial fibrillation 93%
- Clinical Impact of Pharmacogenetic Risk Variants in a Large Chinese Cohort 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging genetic data to elucidate the relationship between Covid-19 and ischemic stroke 94%
- Age at menopause and the risk of stroke: Observational and Mendelian Randomization analysis in 204,244 postmenopausal women 94%
- Intravenous Thrombolysis before Thrombectomy Improves Functional Outcome after Stroke Independent of Reperfusion Grade 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.