Back

Impact of first SARS-CoV-2 infection variant on serological responses against Omicron: findings from the SIREN study

Insalata, F.; Atti, A.; Carr, E. J.; Otter, A. D.; SIREN study group, ; Foulkes, S.; Dowgier, G.; Hobbs, A.; Wu, M. Y.; Hopkins, S.; Charlett, A.; Beale, R.; Hall, V. J.

2025-06-02 infectious diseases
10.1101/2025.06.02.25328497 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite the existing hybrid immunity, a sharp increase in SARS-CoV-2 reinfections was observed worldwide following Omicron variant emergence. We investigated whether the first infecting variant indelibly shapes serological responses against Omicron (BA.1 and BA.2) reinfection. MethodsParticipants with a sequence-confirmed Alpha (n=23) or Delta (n=10) first infection before third vaccine dose (V3) that subsequently had a BA.1 or BA.2 reinfection were selected. Sera were tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (anti-S) and live virus microneutralisation (LV-N) against Ancestral, Alpha, Delta, Omicron BA.1 and BA.2. Antibody responses and waning post-V3 were compared by first infection variant using mixed-effect models, as well as inferred titres 7-days before reinfections. Individuals neutralisation responses were compared 12 weeks post-V3, among those with Alpha and Delta primary infection. ResultsAfter V3, those with Delta first infection had higher LV-N Omicron BA.1 titres (fold difference (FD)=2.7, p=0.05) compared to Alpha primary infection. Participants with Delta first infection presented higher LV-N BA.1 (FD=1.89, p=0.004) and LV-N BA.2 (FD 2.06, p=0.001) titres pre-Omicron reinfections. Individuals neutralisation responses against Ancestral were higher than any other subsequent variants, regardless of first infection variant. DiscussionA previous Delta SARS-CoV-2 infection induced a higher serological response against a subsequent Omicron infection when compared to Alpha first infections.

Published in Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses · training set

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.