Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence Enabled Diabetes Interventions in Lower-Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review Protocol
Desai, H.; Katapally, T. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundDiabetes represents an emerging global health crisis, with lower-middle-income countries experiencing a fast growth in prevalence. Diabetes care in these regions often faces significant challenges, including inadequate healthcare infrastructure, limited financial resources, a shortage of trained healthcare personnel, and a dual burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers tailored and scalable solutions for addressing these systemic barriers by enabling early diagnosis and risk prediction, integrating diabetes care delivery across all levels of healthcare. However, the successful implementation of AI interventions requires an understanding of the unique infrastructural, technological, socio-political, and cultural factors influencing diabetes care in these regions. ObjectiveThis protocol outlines a systematic review to synthesize evidence on the barriers and facilitators to implementing AI-enabled diabetes interventions in lower-middle-income countries, and to examine the specific AI applications being deployed in these settings. MethodsA comprehensive literature search will be performed across five databases: Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library, encompassing peer-reviewed publications from 2015 to 2025. The review will include studies which assess AI-enabled interventions implemented in healthcare settings for diabetes prevention, diagnosis, and management in lower-middle-income countries. Studies that assess the efficacy of artificial intelligence tools without direct evaluation of these tools in clinical decision-making or patient care processes will be excluded. Two independent reviewers will assess studies for inclusion using a predefined search strategy. The reporting of results will adhere to the PRISMA 2020 checklist (1). The risk of bias in individual studies will be evaluated using Hawkers tool for disparate study designs. ConclusionThe findings of this systematic review will identify key considerations for implementing AI technologies in diabetes care and provide evidence to support policymakers, healthcare providers, and technology developers in designing context-appropriate interventions that improve care delivery and health outcomes in lower-middle-income countries.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 93%
- The iDiabetes Platform: Enhanced Phenotyping of Patients with Diabetes for Precision Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment- study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study 93%
- Determining the feasibility of calculating pancreatic cancer risk scores for people with new-onset diabetes in primary care (DEFEND PRIME): study protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of health systems interventions in primary health settings on type 2 diabetes care and health outcomes among adults in West Africa: a systematic review protocol 97%
- The Impact of Clinical Audits on Improving the Effectiveness of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) CARE in Primary Health Centers. A Comprehensive Pre-post analysis through Multi-layered Intervention: The ICAE-DM CARE study protocol 95%
- Michigan men’s diabetes project II: protocol for peer-led diabetes self-management education and long-term support in Black men 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 93%
- Racial disparities in continuous glucose monitoring-based 60-min glucose predictions among people with type 1 diabetes 92%
- Digital Health Technologies for Accessing Contraceptive Services among Young People in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review Protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 91%
- Wearables and smartphones for modifiable risk factors in metabolic health: a scoping review protocol 91%
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 92%
- Regional Prevalence of Hypertension Among People Diagnosed with Diabetes in Africa, A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 92%
- Acceptability of a community health worker- led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.