Identification of Conserved Immune-Related Adverse Event Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes in a Pan-Immunotherapy Data Mart
Schmid, V. C.; Lamparter, D. F.; Mohindra, R.; Karanikas, V.; Kam-Thong, T.; Scepanovic, P.; Duchateau-Nguyen, G.; Roller, A.; Heinzmann, D.; Adams, C.; Mycroft, S. L.; Fairfax, B. P.; Städler, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundCancer immunotherapy often triggers immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Analysis of irAEs in large checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) trials has enhanced their management and demonstrated their prognostic value for treatment outcome. However, data on irAEs in non-standard cancer immunotherapies (CITs) are limited, and systematic exploration is lacking. Identifying predictive biomarkers for irAEs in these therapies is still emerging and essential for improving patient care. MethodsWe established a harmonized data mart from 27 early-phase CIT trials, encompassing 14 molecules with diverse mechanisms across various cancer indications. This dataset includes 3,608 patients, both CPI-naive and CPI-experienced, with detailed information on clinical data, tumor characteristics, soluble biomarkers, and genome-wide genotyping. We examined the occurrence of different irAEs and CIT molecules concerning incidence, severity, and onset. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the association between risk factors and the time to onset of irAEs. Finally, we explored the predictive value of irAEs for clinical outcomes, specifically measured by progression-free survival (PFS). ResultsOur analysis reveals significant variation in irAE incidence and kinetics across CIT molecules. Common irAEs include hepatitis, rash, acute kidney injuries, and hypothyroidism, with hepatitis often severe and others mild. Hepatitis is frequently associated with immunocytokine treatment, while T-cell bispecifics (TCBs) are linked to organ-specific toxicities. Hepatic metastases correlate with hepatitis but inversely with rash; elevated liver enzymes are associated with hepatitis, and high ferritin levels with acute kidney injury risk. Higher myeloid cell counts are associated with reduced rash likelihood. No tumor microenvironment (TME) associations were found, and polygenic risk scores (PGS) show limited utility in our setting. Rash correlates with improved outcomes, whereas hepatitis is associated with a poorer prognosis, independent of baseline prognostic state assessed by the Real World Prognostic score (ROPRO). ConclusionsThese findings highlight the complexity of immune toxicities in early-phase trials, emphasizing the importance of the CIT class, as well as the roles of tumor burden, metastasis sites, and systemic immune state in the development of irAEs. Additionally, the observed association between skin toxicities and improved PFS suggests that skin toxicity could serve as a marker of systemic immune activation across immunotherapy contexts. Key messagesWhat is already known on this topic[bullet] Cancer immunotherapy can induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs); their management and prognostic significance have advanced thanks to data from large checkpoint inhibitor trials. What this study adds[bullet] This study reveals the complexity of irAEs in early-phase pan-immunotherapy trials, highlighting the impact of tumor burden, metastasis sites, and systemic immune state, while identifying skin toxicity as a potential surrogate marker for improved patient outcomes. How this study might affect research, practice or policy[bullet] Our study lays a foundation for pan-immunotherapy irAE research, offering insights for clinicians and drug developers to assess risk profiles and guide the design of future trials for new immunotherapies.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Germline prediction of immune checkpoint inhibitor discontinuation for immune-related adverse events 95%
- Tumor-agnostic transcriptome-based classifier identifies spatial infiltration patterns of CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment and predicts clinical outcome in early- and late-phase clinical trials 94%
- Predictive value of preclinical models for CAR-T cell therapy clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical activity of MAPK targeted therapies in patients with non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors 93%
- Using a recently approved tumor mutational burden biomarker to stratify patients for immunotherapy may introduce a sex bias 93%
- Clinical activity of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) inhibitors in patients with MAP2K1 (MEK1)-mutated metastatic cancers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A three-gene expression score for predicting clinical benefit to anti-PD-1 blockade in advanced renal cell carcinoma 94%
- Integrated immunogenomic analyses of high-grade serous ovarian cancer reveal vulnerability to combination immunotherapy 93%
- Emulation of a target trial from observational data to compare effectiveness of Casirivimab/Imdevimab and Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab for early treatment of non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A phase I clinical trial of intrahepatic artery delivery of TG6002 in combination with oral 5-fluorocytosine in patients with liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer 95%
- Phase 1b dose expansion and translational analyses of olaparib in combination with the oral AKT inhibitor capivasertib in recurrent endometrial, triple negative breast, and ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer 93%
- Myeloid cell-associated resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in urothelial cancer revealed through bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adjuvant nivolumab, capecitabine or the combination in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer: the OXEL randomized phase II study 93%
- Angiogenic and Immune Predictors of Neoadjuvant Axitinib Response in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Venous Tumour Thrombus 93%
- A Standardized Metric to Enhance Clinical Trial Design and Outcome Interpretation in Type 1 Diabetes 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.