Back

Endothelial Activation and Stress Index Predicts Mortality in Critically Ill Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis Using the MIMIC-IV Database

Li, M.; Cai, p.; Li, N.; Liu, J.; Ruan, Y.; Pan, J.; Cai, F.; Xu, C.; Lin, H.-l.

2025-05-31 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.05.29.25328606
Show abstract

BackgroundThe Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) reflects endothelial dysfunction and has prognostic value in cardiovascular diseases. This study investigates the association between EASIX and all-cause mortality in critically ill atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. MethodsUsing MIMIC-IV (v3.1) data, 4722 AF patients were stratified by EASIX quartiles. Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier curves, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) models assessed mortality risk at 7, 30, 180, and 365 days. Subgroup analyses evaluated consistency. ResultsEASIX was significantly associated with increased mortality at all time points. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve shows that as the EASIX quartile increases, the 7-day, 30-day, 180-day, and 365-day mortality rates of AF patients significantly increase. RCS analyses showed that there was a significant non-linear relationship between EASIX and the 7-day, 30-day, 180-day, and 365-day mortality rates of patients with AF. The Cox analysis before and after adjusting for confounding factors showed that EASIX was an independent risk factor for 7-day, 30-day, 180-day, and 365-day all-cause mortality in AF patients. Subgroup analyses further indicated the robustness of these results. ConclusionsEASIX levels are significantly correlated with all-cause mortality at 7, 30, 180, and 365 days in patients with AF, and endothelial dysfunction plays an important role in poor prognosis in AF patients.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 0.3%
15.1%
2
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 4%
7.4%
4
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 59%
7.4%
5
Heart Rhythm
based on 16 papers
Top 0.5%
7.4%
6
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 37%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
4.6%
8
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 2%
3.8%
9
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
10
European Heart Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
11
International Journal of Cardiology
based on 13 papers
Top 1%
2.8%
12
Circulation
based on 37 papers
Top 4%
2.3%
13
Heart
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
2.3%
14
Hypertension
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
15
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Atherosclerosis
based on 16 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 9%
1.3%
19
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
based on 12 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 13%
1.2%
21
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 41%
0.8%
22
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 15%
0.8%
23
Biology Methods and Protocols
based on 19 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Medicine
based on 29 papers
Top 9%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Nutrition
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
based on 10 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Circulation: Heart Failure
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
based on 11 papers
Top 4%
0.7%