Back

Endothelial Activation and Stress Index Predicts Mortality in Critically Ill Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis Using the MIMIC-IV Database

Li, M.; Cai, p.; Li, N.; Liu, J.; Ruan, Y.; Pan, J.; Cai, F.; Xu, C.; Lin, H.-l.

2025-05-31 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.05.29.25328606 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) reflects endothelial dysfunction and has prognostic value in cardiovascular diseases. This study investigates the association between EASIX and all-cause mortality in critically ill atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. MethodsUsing MIMIC-IV (v3.1) data, 4722 AF patients were stratified by EASIX quartiles. Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier curves, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) models assessed mortality risk at 7, 30, 180, and 365 days. Subgroup analyses evaluated consistency. ResultsEASIX was significantly associated with increased mortality at all time points. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve shows that as the EASIX quartile increases, the 7-day, 30-day, 180-day, and 365-day mortality rates of AF patients significantly increase. RCS analyses showed that there was a significant non-linear relationship between EASIX and the 7-day, 30-day, 180-day, and 365-day mortality rates of patients with AF. The Cox analysis before and after adjusting for confounding factors showed that EASIX was an independent risk factor for 7-day, 30-day, 180-day, and 365-day all-cause mortality in AF patients. Subgroup analyses further indicated the robustness of these results. ConclusionsEASIX levels are significantly correlated with all-cause mortality at 7, 30, 180, and 365 days in patients with AF, and endothelial dysfunction plays an important role in poor prognosis in AF patients.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.2%
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
11
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
12
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
13
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
16
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%