Back

Fixel-Based Analysis Identifies Selective Vulnerability of Non-Dominant Fiber Populations in Aging and Cognitive Decline

Sathe, A.; Chatterjee, A.; Shashikumar, N.; Pechman, K. R.; Schilling, K. G.; Landman, B. A.; Bolton, C. J.; Zhang, P.; Bender, A. R.; Hohman, T. J.; Jefferson, A. L.; Archer, D. B.

2025-05-29 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.05.29.25328528 medRxiv
Show abstract

Fixel-Based Analysis (FBA) offers a novel framework to disentangle fiber-specific white matter (WM) degeneration, particularly within complex crossing-fiber architecture where conventional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) falls short. In this study, we leveraged single-shell diffusion MRI data from 297 older adults enrolled in the Vanderbilt Memory & Aging Project to quantify fiber density (FD), cross-section (FC), and their composite (FDC) across primary (N1), secondary (N2), and tertiary (N3) fiber populations. By stratifying white matter into anatomically defined crossing-fiber convergence groups, we examined how fiber dominance and architectural complexity modulate associations with age, cognitive status, and longitudinal cognitive decline. Results revealed that FD and FDC in non-dominant (N2/N3) fibers were the strongest predictors of both baseline and longitudinal cognitive trajectories, particularly in memory and executive domains. These associations persisted across fiber convergence strata, suggesting that fiber population identity, rather than anatomical complexity, may confer greater vulnerability to age- and disease-related degeneration. Our findings position non-dominant fiber metrics as sensitive candidate biomarkers for early white matter disruption in Alzheimers disease and support the application of multi-fiber modeling to enhance detection of preclinical neurodegeneration.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.