Embodied Music Preference Modeling: Real-Time Prediction From Wearable Gait Telemetry, Google Fit Activity, and Gesture-Based Feedback
Hu, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundMusic is widely deployed to enhance exercise, yet far less is known about how an exercisers real-time physiological state feeds back to shape musical liking. Wearable sensors now permit second-by-second coupling of gait dynamics, activity load, and affective response. ObjectiveWe developed a mobile workflow that predicts immediate like versus dislike judgments for unfamiliar songs by fusing clinical-grade inertial kinematics (Ambulosono), passive smartphone activity logs (Google Fit), and a single high-knees/low-knees gesture. The study tested whether momentary movement intensity biases preference, identified the strongest biometric predictors, and evaluated a sensor-aware classifier suitable for adaptive playlists. MethodsSeventy-three healthy undergraduates performed fifty 60-second stepping-in-place trials while listening to tempo-normalised tracks spanning five genres. Ambulosono units sampled lower-limb acceleration at 200 Hz; Google Fit recorded pre- and post-trial step counts. Four gait features--mean and peak cadence, mean and peak step length--were normalised and averaged into a Composite Motivation Score (CMS). Breathlessness and fatigue ratings were logged after each track. A 500-tree random forest trained on gait variables, activity counts, perceptual deltas, and CMS classified preference using 10-fold cross-validation. Statistical tests compared liked and disliked trials for physiological change and speed strata. ResultsThe protocol yielded 3 864 complete song exposures. Participants judged 54 % of tracks liked and 60 % disliked (paired t = -2.11, p = 0.036). Disliked trials exhibited larger breathlessness and fatigue increases (Wilcoxon p < 0.05). High-CMS trials showed a 68 % like-rate versus 37 % in low-CMS trials. The classifier achieved 0.78 accuracy and 0.82 AUC; permutation analysis ranked post-trial Google Fit steps, bout duration, and pre-trial steps as top predictors. Track-level analysis revealed that the ten most-disliked songs coincided with the highest mean stepping speeds, despite non-significant effects at coarse speed tiers. ConclusionsImmediate bodily engagement and short-term physiological strain strongly colour musical appraisal. Integrating wearable kinematics, smartphone step counts, and low-friction gestures enables accurate, interpretable prediction of liking, paving the way for context-adaptive playlists and emotionally intelligent rehabilitation cues.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Population Analysis Of Mortality Risk: Predictive Models Using Motion Sensors For 100,000 Participants In The UK Biobank National Cohort 94%
- Feasibility characteristics of wrist-worn fitness trackers in health status monitoring for post-COVID patients in remote and rural areas 90%
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Ramp protocol: Uncovering individual differences in walking to an auditory beat using TeensyStep 94%
- Synchrony in the periphery: inter-subject correlation of physiological responses during live music concerts 94%
- Improvisation and Live Accompaniment Increase Motor Response and Reward During a Music Playing Task 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing electromyography, accelerometry, and visual inspection to assess the resting motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation 90%
- Improved accuracy of the whole body Center of Mass position through Kalman filtering 89%
- Automatic approach-avoidance tendency toward physical activity, sedentary, and neutral stimuli as a function of age, explicit affective attitude, and intention to be active 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.