Back

A germline and somatic mutation sorting (GeMSort) algorithm for extracting presumed germline pathogenic variants in liquid genomic profiling: Insights from Database of Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT)

Oda, S.; Matsukawa, M.; Tomozawa, C.; Tanabe, N.; Watanabe, T.; Koyama, T.; Yoshida, T.; Hirata, M.

2025-05-31 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.05.29.25327892
Show abstract

Liquid biopsy comprehensive genomic profiling (LB-CGP) testing is performed on circulating tumor DNA to detect tumor recurrence, predict prognosis, and select therapeutic agents. Pathogenic variants of germline origin in genes associated with hereditary tumor syndrome (HTS) can be simultaneously detected by CGP testing. Nonetheless, it is often challenging to differentiate whether the variants are of somatic or germline origin. The differentiation criteria were primarily based on the variant allele frequencies (VAFs). However, more evidence is needed to establish clear criteria, and it is often difficult to differentiate between variants based on VAF alone. In this study, using the national database of the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics, which accumulates real-world data on CGP testing in Japan, we analyzed 169,370 variants detected in 11,399 patients registered with FoundationOne Liquid CDx testing. By extracting the predominantly presumed somatic and germline variants, we established a criterion for VAF that could achieve high specificity and sensitivity. Further investigation into the detection status of other variants led to the development of an algorithm for differentiating somatic/germline variants of genes associated with HTSs. Based on this algorithm, 726 variants were extracted as presumed germline pathogenic variants among the 26 genes with high germline conversion rates in 710 patients in the study. This algorithm should help to discriminate with high accuracy whether the variants detected in LB-CGP tests are of somatic or germline origin, although further analyses are required to confirm the validity of this algorithm. Highlights- The highly accurate VAF criterion for differentiating somatic and germline variants was determined using real-world data from more than 11,000 patients who underwent liquid biopsy CGP testing. - To improve the specificity of the PGPV extraction, an additional criterion was defined: checking the status of other genomic alterations detected. - Criteria for considering information other than VAFs associated with the variant under PGPV consideration were developed to improve the sensitivity of PGPV extraction. - By integrating these criteria and previous evidence on germline conversion rates, a GeMSort algorithm was established. - Based on this algorithm, 726 variants from 710 patients were extracted as PGPVs among 26 hereditary tumor syndrome-associated genes with high germline conversion rates.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
based on 24 papers
Top 0.1%
11.0%
2
Genetics in Medicine
based on 57 papers
Top 1%
7.4%
3
Genome Medicine
based on 56 papers
Top 1%
6.3%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 29%
6.3%
5
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 3%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 2%
4.4%
8
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 74%
3.8%
9
Human Mutation
based on 14 papers
Top 0.5%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 2%
2.3%
11
European Journal of Human Genetics
based on 25 papers
Top 1.0%
2.2%
12
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 15%
1.8%
13
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 5%
1.7%
14
Human Genomics
based on 13 papers
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Journal of Medical Genetics
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
1.5%
17
PLOS Genetics
based on 39 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 35%
1.3%
19
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Genes
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
21
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Clinical Chemistry
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 16%
0.8%
24
BMC Medical Genomics
based on 12 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Clinical and Translational Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Journal of Personalized Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Medicine
based on 29 papers
Top 9%
0.7%
28
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 12%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Pharmacology
based on 27 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
30
npj Genomic Medicine
based on 18 papers
Top 4%
0.7%