Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation (CCSV) during cardiac arrest in animals and humans: A scoping review
Brock, R.; Veigl, C.; Kornfehl, A.; Wittig, J.; Heider, S.; Tapinova, K.; Snijders, E.; Dunkl, S.; Grassmann, D.; Heller, B.; Krammel, M.; Schnaubelt, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundVentilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) should be effective. Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation (CCSV) is a novel approach aimed at optimizing gas exchange and hemodynamics by synchronizing mechanical ventilation with chest compressions. However, its clinical value, safety profile, and implementation barriers remain unclear. We thus aimed to systematically synthesize existing evidence on the use of CCSV during cardiac arrest in animals and humans. MethodsWe conducted a scoping review and systematically searched five databases (Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science) up to May 2025. Studies investigating CCSV or mechanistically related ventilation strategies during cardiac arrest were included regardless of study design, language, or publication date. Data were charted for study characteristics, outcomes, and adverse events. ResultsThirty-one studies published between 1980 and 2025 were included. Most were animal studies (n=19), primarily conducted in pigs, with limited human data (n=9). CCSV showed favorable effects on arterial oxygenation, carbon dioxide clearance, and hemodynamic parameters. Some studies reported improved return of spontaneous circulation and cerebral oxygenation compared to conventional ventilation modes. Adverse events such as pneumothorax and lung injury were inconsistently reported and mostly limited to animal models. ConclusionsAvailable data on CCSV suggests potential physiological benefits during CPR, particularly in experimental settings. Human data remain scarce, and larger, prospective human trials are essential to evaluate clinical effectiveness, guide implementation, and assess risks compared to conventional ventilation strategies.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Diversity of CPR manikins for basic life support education: Use of manikin sex, race, and body shape – A scoping review 94%
- Post-exertion oxygen saturation as a prognostic factor for adverse outcome in patients attending the emergency department with suspected COVID-19: Observational cohort study 93%
- Is higher-level trauma center care associated with better outcomes in patients injured by low-energy trauma? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of successful weaning from Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V-A ECMO): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 95%
- Observational study of changes in utilization and outcomes in non-invasive ventilation in COVID-19 94%
- Effects of sustained inflation pressure during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated piglets 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Oxygen Saturation Targets on Neurologic Outcomes after Cardiac Arrest: A Secondary Analysis of the PILOT Trial 94%
- Development and Prospective Validation of a Transparent Deep Learning Algorithm for Predicting Need for Mechanical Ventilation 90%
- Effect of Ventilator Mode on Ventilator-Free Days in Critically Ill Adults: A Randomized Trial 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Helmet noninvasive ventilation for COVID-19 patients (Helmet-COVID): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial 94%
- Performance of digital Early Warning Score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist setting: retrospective cohort study 93%
- The COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium observational study: Design and rationale of a prospective, international, multicenter, observational study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hemodynamics with Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Using a Cardiogenic Shock Model 94%
- Performance of EasyBreath ® Decathlon Snorkeling mask for Delivering Continuous Positive Airway Pressure 93%
- The effect of oxygen on hemodynamic variables in neonates with single ventricle after the Norwood procedure 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.