Equity in protection: bridging global data gaps for an EBV vaccine - a systematic review and meta-analysis
Muckian, M. D.; Shi, T.; Qarkaxhija, V.; Kapoor, S.; Morgan, T.; Stagg, H. R. R.
Show abstract
IntroductionEpstein-Barr virus (EBV) is linked to multiple malignancies and autoimmune conditions, with different disease burdens globally. Pharmaceutical companies and researchers are placing substantial investment in the development of EBV vaccines. To ensure optimal vaccine roll-out, particularly in resource-limited settings, it is essential to have data on the age at acquisition of EBV. We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyse seroprevalence by age by country, World Health Organization (WHO) region, and country income level; to identify knowledge gaps; and determine an approach to bridge these gaps. MethodsMEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched on March 22, 2022, for studies that measured EBV seroprevalence by age. An updated search was conducted on October 22, 2022. There were no language restrictions. Papers were assessed for quality using an adapted version of the Downs and Black checklist. Seroprevalence by age was estimated using a fixed-effect (country) or random-effects (WHO region, income) meta-analysis. This review has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022349900). ResultsOnly one country (United States) had enough data for a country meta-analysis. WHO Regional analyses revealed the Western Pacific region to have a higher seroprevalence at younger age groups than other WHO regions. Country income level better explained seroprevalence trends per age. Middle-income countries displayed a quicker rise to equilibrium seroprevalence than high-income countries, with a 30% absolute increase in 0- to 4-year-olds in middle-income than high-income countries (59% [95% CI 28-91%, I2 =99%] versus 29% [95% CI 16-41%, I2 =99%], respectively). ConclusionThis first meta-analysis producing estimates of EBV seroprevalence by age, provides crucial information to guide governments when choosing if to implement a vaccine for EBV. However, data variability and limited consistency of methodologies and EBV seroprevalence measurements hindered comprehensive meta-analyses across all WHO regions and countries. We provide an interim framework for the extrapolation of seroprevalence using country-specific income levels to aid vaccine rollout decisions. Key MessagesO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSThis study built on a previous systematic review evaluating the global literature to identify risk factors associated with EBV acquisition. The review searched three databases, (MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science), for studies investigating EBV risk factors (including age), on March 16 2017. No meta-analysis was performed, limiting the conclusions that could be drawn, but when data were grouped by country and WHO region it was revealed that EBV seroconversion tends to occur at younger ages in Asia versus Europe and North America. A substantial data gap was identified for countries in Africa and South America. What this study addsOur study documents more than double the number of publications on EBV seroprevalence by age globally and provides the first meta-analysis on the topic, which will be vital for governments seeking to deploy an EBV vaccine in their country. In the face of a dearth of data for many countries (particularly low- and middle-income countries, such as China, where EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma is endemic), we demonstrate how country income can be used to group studies and thus extrapolate to fill data gaps. How this study might affect research, practice or policyThe deployment strategy and cost-effectiveness case for an EBV vaccine will vary substantially among countries due to geographic variability in a) the burden of EBV-associated diseases and b) when infection is acquired. To inform deployment, it is critical to either have country-by-country data on the age at acquisition or a means to extrapolate from another appropriate setting. Our study informs policymakers on both points, by providing both meta-analysis estimates where possible and an interim framework for extrapolation of data among countries before new seroprevalence studies arise. This is particularly critical for low- and middle-income countries where data are sparse.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections: update of a living systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Global epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of standardized population-based seroprevalence studies, Jan 2020-Dec 2021 93%
- Assessing the impact of preventive mass vaccination campaigns on yellow fever outbreaks in Africa : a population-level self-controlled case-series study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Models of COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation: a systematic literature search and narrative review 92%
- Estimating the cost-effectiveness of maternal vaccination and monoclonal antibodies for respiratory syncytial virus in Kenya and South Africa 92%
- Influential drivers of the cost-effectiveness of respiratory syncytial virus vaccination in European older adults: A multi-country analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of residual blood specimens in seroprevalence studies for vaccine preventable diseases: A scoping review 95%
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of yellow fever vaccine in elderly population 92%
- Effectiveness of vaccination against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 infection in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis of standardised seroprevalence studies, from January 2020 to December 2021 95%
- Epidemiological impact and cost-effectiveness analysis of COVID-19 vaccination in Kenya 92%
- Assessing the Burden of COVID-19 in Developing Countries: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Public Policy Implications 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections with cumulative and imputed COVID-19 cases: systematic review 94%
- Susceptibility and infectiousness of SARS-CoV-2 in children versus adults, by variant (wild-type, Alpha, Delta): a systematic review and meta-analysis of household contact studies 93%
- Monovalent mRNA XBB.1.5 vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 hospitalization in Quebec, Canada: impact of variant replacement and waning protection during 10-month follow-up 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.