A Virtual Reality-Based Assessment Tool for Apathy
Harlev, D.; Ravona-Springer, R.; Koren, O.; Zorani, S.; Plotnik, M.; Wolpe, N.
Show abstract
ImportanceApathy is a common and disabling syndrome in aging and neurodegenerative disease. Existing assessment tools rely on subjective reporting, limiting their accuracy in cognitively impaired individuals or in individuals with otherwise impaired insight. ObjectiveTo identify behavioral subgroups relevant to apathy using gaze-based metrics in an emotionally salient virtual reality (VR) setting, and to characterize their clinical and physiological profiles. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsCross-sectional study of 85 older adults (mean age 74 {+/-} 5.7 years) with varying cognitive abilities, recruited from a memory clinic. Participants completed a naturalistic VR task while gaze and physiological signals were recorded. ExposuresPositive, aversive, and neutral images were presented within a 3D VR environment. Gaze features included time to first fixation, total fixation duration, and fixation variability. Physiological signals included heart rate variability (HRV), galvanic skin response, and respiration. Main Outcomes and MeasuresUnsupervised clustering (K-means) was applied to gaze metrics to derive behavioral engagement profiles. Between-group differences in apathy severity (LARS), cognitive function (MoCA), and physiological reactivity were examined using linear mixed-effects models. ResultsTwo distinct behavioral subgroups emerged: "engagers" (n = 48) and "non-engagers" (n = 37). Non-engagers were older, showed higher apathy scores, and had lower MoCA scores. Physiologically, they exhibited lower baseline HRV but showed a selective increase in HRV during exposure to positive stimuli. No group differences were observed in response to aversive stimuli or in other physiological signals. Conclusions and RelevanceThis study introduces a novel, nonverbal approach for identifying apathy through naturalistic gaze behavior in VR. The findings highlight a physiologically responsive yet behaviorally disengaged subgroup, suggesting that emotional reactivity may persist even when outward engagement is diminished. Gaze-based phenotyping in immersive environments may offer a scalable tool for detecting motivational impairments in aging and can be further tested in individuals with poor insight to inform future personalized assessment strategies.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The heartbeat-evoked potential in young and older adults during attention orienting 93%
- The relationship between task-related aperiodic EEG activity, neural inefficiency and verbal working memory in younger and older adults 92%
- Electrophysiological normative responses to emotional, neutral, and cigarette-related images. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeted memory reactivation during REM sleep in patients with social anxiety disorder 92%
- Quantification of stress and well-being using pulse, speech, and electrodermal data: Study concept and design 91%
- Variability in infants functional brain network connectivity is associated with differences in affect and behavior 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Insulin resistance, cognition, and functional brain network topology in older adults with obesity 93%
- Multiple bouts of high-intensity interval exercise reverse age-related functional connectivity disruptions without affecting motor learning in older adults 92%
- Distinct components of cardiovascular health are linked with age-related differences in cognitive abilities 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neurophysiological Changes Associated with Vibroacoustically-augmented Breath-focused Mindfulness for Dissociation: Targeting Interoception and Attention 92%
- Association between loneliness and hippocampal responses to dynamic social stimuli in psychotic disorders 91%
- Impaired Visuospatial Working Memory but Preserved Attentional Control in Bipolar Disorder 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.