Data-Driven Predictive Modeling for Massive Intraoperative Blood Loss during Liver Transplantation: Integrating Machine Learning Techniques
Wakiya, T.; Sanada, Y.; Okada, N.; Hirata, Y.; Horiuchi, T.; Omameuda, T.; Onishi, Y.; Sakuma, Y.; Yamaguchi, H.; Sasaki, Y.; Sata, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundMassive intraoperative bleeding (IBL) in liver transplantation (LT) poses serious risks and strains healthcare resources necessitating better predictive models for risk stratification. As traditional models often fail to capture the complex, non-linear patterns underlying bleeding risk, this study aimed to develop data-driven machine learning models for predicting massive IBL during LT using preoperative factors. MethodsTwo hundred ninety consecutive LT cases from a prospective database were analyzed. Logistic regression models were built using 73 preoperative demographic and laboratory variables to predict massive IBL ([≥] 80 mL/kg). The dataset was randomly split (70% training, 30% testing). The model was trained and validated through three-fold cross-validation, with backward stepwise feature selection iterated 100 times across unique random splits. The final model, based on a high stability index, was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). ResultsMassive IBL was observed in 141 patients (48.6%). In standard logistic regression, significant differences were found in 42 of 73 factors between groups stratified by massive IBL, however, substantial multicollinearity limited interpretability. In the feature selection across 100 iterations, the data-driven model achieved an average AUC of 0.840 in the validation and 0.738 in the test datasets. The final model, based on 11 selected features with a high stability index, achieved an AUC of 0.844. An easy-to-use online risk calculator for massive IBL was developed and is available at: https://tai1wakiya.shinyapps.io/ldlt_bleeding_ml/. ConclusionsOur findings highlight the potential of machine learning in capturing complex risk factor interactions for predicting massive IBL in LT.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.