How effective is generative AI advice for the academic advancement of faculty?
Yeo, M. M.; Navedo, D. D.; Casey, P. J.; Tan, B.
Show abstract
The SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Center manages over 2,800 clinical faculty members and processes over 400 appointments and promotions annually. The current Promotion and Tenure documentation includes over 30 documents, making it difficult and time-consuming for the faculty to locate specific appointment information. We developed "AskADD" in response to requests for clearer academic career development guidance. This study reports initial alpha testing and subsequent beta testing with 35 faculty members using AskADD. AskADD aids the faculty--physician-educators, physician-scientists, physician-innovators, and physician-leaders--in navigating academic career paths while increasing transparency and trust in appointment, promotion, and tenure processes. Our AI-integrated systems, initially tested using low or no-code Microsoft platforms and later developed with a custom GPT, deliver contextualized responses to promotion and tenure queries. The faculty and staff participated in user testing, providing feedback for improvements. Alpha and beta testing conducted with the same group of users indicated that a substantial portion of participants found the tool beneficial; suggestions were given for further refinement. Our experience contributes to the limited literature on AI-driven faculty advancement in academic medical centers and offers a novel paradigm for academic career support.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 94%
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 93%
- From months to minutes: creating Hyperion, a novel data management system expediting data insights for oncology research and patient care 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Using Stakeholder Insights to Enhance Engagement in PhD Professional Development 94%
- High School Science Fair: What Students Say -- Mastery, Performance, and Self-Determination Theory 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 93%
- Performance of ChatGPT on Chinese National Medical Licensing Examinations: A Five-Year Examination Evaluation Study for Physicians, Pharmacists and Nurses 93%
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 93%
- Design and implementation of a system for automated monitoring of adherence to evidenced-based clinical guideline recommendations 93%
- Tracking private WhatsApp discourse about COVID-19: A longitudinal infodemiology study in Singapore 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 94%
- The potential for digital patient symptom recording through symptom assessment applications to optimize patient flow and reduce waiting times in Urgent Care Centers: a simulation study 94%
- A Web-based, Mobile Responsive Application to Screen Healthcare Workers for COVID Symptoms: Descriptive Study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.