Back

How effective is generative AI advice for the academic advancement of faculty?

Yeo, M. M.; Navedo, D. D.; Casey, P. J.; Tan, B.

2025-05-26 medical education
10.1101/2025.05.25.25328317 medRxiv
Show abstract

The SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Center manages over 2,800 clinical faculty members and processes over 400 appointments and promotions annually. The current Promotion and Tenure documentation includes over 30 documents, making it difficult and time-consuming for the faculty to locate specific appointment information. We developed "AskADD" in response to requests for clearer academic career development guidance. This study reports initial alpha testing and subsequent beta testing with 35 faculty members using AskADD. AskADD aids the faculty--physician-educators, physician-scientists, physician-innovators, and physician-leaders--in navigating academic career paths while increasing transparency and trust in appointment, promotion, and tenure processes. Our AI-integrated systems, initially tested using low or no-code Microsoft platforms and later developed with a custom GPT, deliver contextualized responses to promotion and tenure queries. The faculty and staff participated in user testing, providing feedback for improvements. Alpha and beta testing conducted with the same group of users indicated that a substantial portion of participants found the tool beneficial; suggestions were given for further refinement. Our experience contributes to the limited literature on AI-driven faculty advancement in academic medical centers and offers a novel paradigm for academic career support.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.5%
3
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
7
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
8
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
9
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
10
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
13
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
17
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
19
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
22
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.7%