Back

Differential expression of mitochondria-associated genes in clinical samples of Plasmodium falciparum showing severe manifestations

Gujarati, S.; Singal, B. R.; Gupta, D.; Kochar, S. K.; Kochar, D. K.; Das, A.

2025-11-15 genomics
10.1101/2025.05.24.655897 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The malaria parasite mitochondrial proteins are critical targets for antimalarial drugs, however, the emergence of drug resistance against the existing protein targets necessitates novel therapeutic approaches. In this study,we profiled mitochondrial sense and natural antisense transcripts (NATs) in 22 Plasmodium falciparum clinical isolates, classified into three disease groups - uncomplicated malaria (UNC, n=6), cerebral malaria (CM, n=4), and hepatic dysfunction (HD, n=12), using a custom, strand-aware 60K microarray, and validated the transcriptome using pooled, strand-specific RNA-seq (uncomplicated pool and complicated pool). Differential gene expression in the CM and HD cohort was obtained by comparing with uncomplicated malaria (UNC) as the control cohort. The analysis revealed distinct disease-specific sense and NATs, encoded by the mitochondrial genome, along with those encoded in the nucleus and targeted to the parasite mitochondria. Although mitochondrial activity is known to be reduced in blood-stage malaria, upregulation of genes linked to tricarboxylic-acid-cycle and electron-transport in the CM cluster indicates disrupted mitochondrial bioenergetics in severe disease. Profiling of sense and antisense mitochondrial transcripts reveal a correlated expression of sense-antisense transcript pairs in both the disease manifestations, indicating a potential regulatory role of NATs in mitochondrial function. These data provide direct evidence of NATs originating from the parasite mitochondrial genome and nominate key NATs against core mitochondrial functions as potential non-conventional antimalarial targets.

Published in BMC Genomics (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.