Mpox vaccine uptake in the most endemic focus in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis (1970-2024)
Cheuyem, F. Z. L.; Amani, A.; Umar, A. A.; Achangwa, C.; Ajong, B. N.; Dabou, S.; Goupeyou-Youmsi, J.; Ndibo, G. R. P.; Tchamani, R.; Eno, E.; Ndungo, J. H.; Nadarajah, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is recognized as the global epicenter of human Mpox. While vaccination is crucial for outbreak prevention, especially as the disease transitions from zoonotic spillover to sustained human-to-human transmission, comprehensive assessments of vaccination coverage trends across the country are notably absent from the literature. This systematic review and meta-analysis address this gap by providing the first pooled estimate of Mpox vaccine uptake and acceptance in the DRC over a 54-year period (1970-2024). Our study captures critical transitions, including the post-smallpox eradication era and recent global outbreaks, to identify temporal trends, geographic disparities in this high-risk setting. MethodsWe conducted this review following PRISMA guidelines, systematically searching PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Sciences, CINAHL, and Embase. Grey literature was also searched to ensure comprehensiveness. Using random-effects models, we calculated pooled estimates for vaccine uptake and acceptance rates, with prespecified subgroup analyses examining variations by: (1) period, (2) geographic region, and (3) type of participants. We quantified heterogeneity using I2 statistics and conducted meta-regression to identify predictors of vaccination coverage heterogeneity. A p-value 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsOur analysis revealed a pooled Mpox vaccine uptake of 20.01% (95% CI: 7.45-43.75) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.4%, p < 0.001), indicating substantial variability across studies. Vaccine acceptance was higher at 54.17% (95% CI: 20.82-84.16) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 97.6%, p < 0.001). Temporal analysis showed a significant decline from 32.30% (95% CI: 14.62-57.75) coverage during 1970-2000 to 1.36% (95% CI: 0.29-6.11) in 2020-2024. Geographic disparities existed, with the Northwest regions achieving 47.11% (95% CI: 13.46-83.61) coverage compared to 5.47% (95% CI: 0.56-37.32) in Eastern conflict-affected zones. Meta-regression identified no significant predictors of coverage heterogeneity. ConclusionDespite moderate acceptance rates, actual Mpox vaccination uptake in the DRC remains critically low, with worsening coverage in recent years and substantial regional inequities. These findings underscore the urgent need for context-specific interventions to bridge the intention-action gap in this high-risk setting.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MVA-BN Vaccine Effectiveness: A Systematic Review of Real-World Evidence in Outbreak Settings 95%
- What is the quality of evidence informing vaccine clinical practice recommendations in Australia? 95%
- Effectiveness of Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine in Zimbabwe used in response to an outbreak among children and young adults: a matched case control study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Public perceptions of Ebola vaccines and confidence in health services to treat Ebola, malaria, and tuberculosis: Findings from a cross-sectional household survey in Uganda, 2020 95%
- The burden of vaccine hesitancy for routine immunization in Yaounde-Cameroon: restrictive sampling technique 95%
- Mapping the Existing Body of Knowledge on New and Repurposed TB Vaccine Implementation: A Scoping Review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing disruptions in childhood routine immunisation services during the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives and lessons learned from Liberia, Nepal, and Senegal 94%
- Impact of health system strengthening on delivery strategies to improve child immunization coverage and inequalities in rural Madagascar 93%
- When do persuasive messages on vaccine safety steer COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and recommendations? Behavioral insights from a randomised controlled experiment in Malaysia 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.