Back

Marginal zone and follicular B cells respond differently to TLR4 and TLR9 stimulation

Makkar, H.; Remick, S.; Roy, S.; Zangle, T. A.; Roy, K.

2025-05-25 immunology
10.1101/2025.05.20.655194 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Marginal zone (MZ) B cells are considered to be innate-like immune cells, and follicular (FO) B cells are considered to be adaptive immune B cells. Yet, the proliferative response of MZ and FO B cells to different innate stimuli remains unclear. Here, we investigated cell growth, division, and death to determine the collective proliferative response of MZ and FO B cells in response to innate stimuli, LPS and CpG. We show that the growth rate of FO B cells is higher than that of MZ B cells in response to CpG, though MZ B cells acquire a higher mass at division, whereas both the growth rate and mass at division for MZ and FO B cells remain similar in response to LPS stimulation. We show that MZ B cells divide faster and induce a higher cRel expression in response to both CpG and LPS stimulation than FO B cells. A higher proportion of MZ B cells enter first division in response to LPS stimulation, not in response to CpG stimulation, than FO B cells. Interestingly, CpG stimulation, not LPS stimulation, leads to higher cell death in MZ B cells than FO B cells. In response to LPS stimulation, MZ B cells show a higher cell number at early time and a reduced/ similar cell number at late time, whereas in response to CpG stimulation, MZ B cells show a lower cell number at both early and late time. Our study suggests that LPS and CpG stimulation impact cell growth, division, and death differently, which in turn regulate different proliferative responses of MZ and FO B cells. Thus, our study offers a new perspective that different innate stimuli regulate different features of proliferative responses.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.4%
2
Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
5
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
6
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
7
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
European Journal of Immunology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
9
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
10
Journal of Biosciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
11
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
12
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
13
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
17
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Cellular & Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
ImmunoHorizons
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
Journal of Molecular Cell Biology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Journal of Leukocyte Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%