Comparing AI and Human Mentoring in Supporting Dental Student Well-being: A Mixed-Methods Study
Rath, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundDental education is associated with high psychological distress among students, exacerbated by intensive clinical training and variable institutional support. Traditional mentoring programs mitigate such challenges, yet faculty shortages and resource constraints necessitate exploration of alternative models. Artificial intelligence (AI) platforms such as ChatGPT offer potential supplemental mentoring support; however, their comparative effectiveness in health professions education remains underexplored. MethodsThis comparative, convergent mixed-methods study was conducted at SEGi University, Malaysia, involving 31 Year 4 dental students receiving human mentoring and 36 Year 5 students utilizing ChatGPT as an AI mentor. Quantitative outcomes were assessed using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21), the Perceived Mentor Support Scale (PMSS), and the Mentoring Effectiveness Scale (MES). Qualitative data were collected through focus groups and analysis of ChatGPT interaction logs. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests and ANOVA, while thematic analysis was used for qualitative data integration. ResultsYear 4 students demonstrated significant reductions in stress, anxiety, and depression scores (p < 0.001) and greater improvements in perceived mentor support (p < 0.001) and mentoring effectiveness (p < 0.001) compared to Year 5 students. Year 5 students reported modest gains following ChatGPT mentoring, highlighting strengths in accessibility and immediacy but limitations in emotional resonance. Qualitative themes underscored human mentors superior capacity for emotional attunement, while ChatGPT was valued for availability and practical support. ConclusionsWhile AI-based mentoring via ChatGPT shows promise in enhancing mentoring accessibility, human mentorship remains critical for addressing the emotional and relational needs of dental students. Careful integration of AI tools into hybrid mentorship models could optimize support systems, particularly in resource-constrained educational environments. Future research should explore ethical frameworks and training strategies to enhance empathetic AI mentorship in health professions education.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 97%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 96%
- Impacts of lack of pocket money on undergraduate students' clinical learning activities 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote Learning Barriers and Opportunities for Graduate Student and Postdoctoral Learners in Career and Professional Skill Development: A Case Study 94%
- Preprint peer review enhances undergraduate biology students' disciplinary literacy and sense of belonging in STEM 93%
- Biofilms with a dash of color: A hands-on activity for school students to build a biofilm model, and use it to understand antibiotic tolerance in biofilms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Kindness By Post’: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of A Participatory Public Mental Health Project 92%
- The measurement properties and acceptability of a new parent-infant bonding tool (‘Me and My Baby’) designed for use in a universal healthcare setting in the UK 92%
- The efficacy of a virtual reality exposure therapy treatment for fear of flying: A retrospective study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 96%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 95%
- COVIDReady2 Study Protocol: Cross-sectional Survey of Medical Student Volunteering and Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 95%
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 94%
- Impact of COVID-19 on College Students' at One of the Most Diverse Campuses in the United States: A Factor Analysis of Survey Data 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.