Back

A conserved region T-cell vaccine for Sarbecoviruses

Escarra-Senmarti, M.; Brockhurst, J.; Maxwell, a. R.; Godwin, t.; Zhang, t.; Chen, y.; Um, P. K.; Danilova, L.; Hsu, W.-c.; Lin, C. T.; Hanke, T.; Bishai, W. R.; Pekosz, A.; Brayton, C.; Korber, B.; rosario, M.

2025-05-22 immunology
10.1101/2025.05.20.654373 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The rapid development of vaccines was a critical part of the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 (a Sarbecovirus and member of the Betacoronavirus genus responsible for the pandemic) virus was first detected in Wuhan, China in late 2019. Effective mRNA vaccines based on the viral Spike protein were designed from the earliest isolates and available by December of 2020. SARS-CoV-2 has continued to evolve in the human population, accruing neutralizing antibody resistance mutations that have necessitated updating the vaccine periodically to better match contemporary variants. Neutralizing antibody cross-reactivity is generally very limited among the diverse members of the betacoronavirus genus that are of clinical importance in people. Here, we present an alternative vaccine strategy based on eliciting T-cell responses targeting four highly conserved regions shared across the betacoronavirus proteomes. We hypothesized that cross-reactive responses to these regions could temper disease severity. Focusing immune responses on highly conserved epitopes could be beneficial as SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, or if a novel betacoronavirus should enter the human population. Vaccination with these highly conserved regions induced robust T-cell responses in mice and rhesus macaques. Vaccinated hamsters were significantly protected against weight loss and lung inflammation after challenge with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. After a SARS-CoV-2 Delta challenge in rhesus macaques, 3 out of 4 animals in the control group had infectious virus in their bronchoalveolar lavage samples, while the 4 animals in the vaccinated group did not.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.