Multi-ancestry genetic architecture of sleep duration and its relationship to other sleep and psychiatric phenotypes
Austin-Zimmerman, I.; Levey, D. F.; Deak, J. D.; Galimberti, M.; Adhikari, K.; Coleman, J. R.; the VA Million Veteran Program, ; Buysse, D. J.; Wilson, P. W. F.; Sofer, T.; Gaziano, J. M.; Gottlieb, D. J.; Stein, M.; Di Forti, M.; Gelernter, J.
Show abstract
Differences in sleep duration, quality, and timing are associated with variation in cognition, health outcomes, and quality of life. Genetic studies may help explain the underlying mechanisms of sleep and its relationships to other conditions. Our previous work highlighted risk loci associated with short (<6hrs) and long sleep (>9hrs), using data from the UK Biobank and the Million Veteran Program. We build on this work by conducting a genome wide association study (GWAS) and multi-ancestry meta-analysis of sleep duration as a quantitative trait. We used LD score regression (LDSC) to evaluate the correlation between sleep duration and other traits, and genomic structural equation modelling (genomicSEM) to consider the relationships between traits of interest. We identify 234 independent genome-wide significant loci for sleep duration, of which 143 are novel. The average impact of each risk variant amounts to approximately {+/-}0.86minutes (sd=0.19), with a sum total of {+/-} 220.5 minutes across all genome-wide significant loci. We support previous findings showing the most strongly associated gene is PAX8. Linkage disequilibrium score regression shows that the genetic architecture of sleep duration is largely distinct from other measures of sleep quality and sleep disorders. We see several examples of negative correlation between deleterious traits and the quantitative measure of sleep duration reported here, contrasting with positive associations with long and short sleep (e.g., depression, ADHD, cannabis use disorder, smoking). We derive genomic-SEM models that show short and long sleep load on separate factors, as does overall sleep duration loading alone. This is the largest available GWAS of sleep duration, and the first to extend analyses outside of European ancestry populations. We identify novel loci for sleep duration and provide insight to the shared and unique genetic architecture across multiple sleep and neuropsychiatric traits.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Discovery of genomic loci associated with sleep apnoea risk through multi-trait GWAS analysis with snoring 98%
- Schizophrenia-associated variation at ZNF804A correlates with altered experience-dependent dynamics of sleep slow-waves and spindles in healthy young adults 94%
- Associations between brain structure and sleep patterns across adolescent development 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Large-Scale Genome-Wide Study of Gene-Sleep Duration Interactions for Blood Pressure in 811,405 Individuals from Diverse Populations 96%
- Multi-ancestry genome-wide gene-sleep interactions identify novel loci for blood pressure 96%
- Dysfunction of ventral tegmental area GABA neurons causes mania-like behavior 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-channel recordings reveal age-related differences in the sleep of juvenile and adult zebra finches 93%
- Sleep Regularity Index as a Novel Indicator of Sleep Disturbance in Stroke Survivors: A Secondary Data Analysis 92%
- Delta-range coupling between prefrontal cortex and hippocampus supported by respiratory rhythmic input from the olfactory bulb in freely behaving rats 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular rhythm alterations in prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens associated with opioid use disorder 93%
- Neandertal introgression dissects the genetic landscape of neuropsychiatric disorders and associated behavioral phenotypes 92%
- Distinguishing clinical and genetic risk factors for suicidal ideation and behavior in a diverse hospital population 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.