Back

Successes and Challenges of an online based nutrition awareness program in 9-11-year-old children In Four Arab Countries: The Ajyal Salima digital platform Qualitative study

Habib-Mourad, C.; Maliha, C. A.; Kassis, A.; Tailfeathers, D.; Bardus, M.; Haji, E.; AlTarazi, L.; Totah, S.; Hwalla, N.

2025-05-22 nutrition
10.1101/2025.05.18.25327873
Show abstract

Introduction.Digital technologies are increasingly influencing childrens lives, with many seeking digital platforms for nutritional education. This study aims to assess the usability and acceptability of Ajyal Salima, a nutrition awareness digital platform targeting children aged 9-11, in four Arab countries. Methods.A qualitative study was led across four countries: Lebanon, Bahrain, Palestine, and Jordan. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with children and parents, and one-to-one interviews were held with teachers. Data was analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results.Four major themes emerged: platforms usability, content enjoyment, changes in childrens habits and recommendations to improve the platform. Overall, parents and teachers found the digital experience positive and useful and the content appropriate for children, particularly younger age groups. Challenges included registration difficulties, technical problems, internet accessibility, low parental involvement, and difficulties integrating the platform into teachers schedules. The platforms animations were less effective in sustaining childrens attention amid evolving digital standards. Conclusion.To enhance the platforms effectiveness, recommendations include simplifying the registration process, enhancing content interactivity, aligning the platform with school curricula, and equipping teachers with supportive resources. Fostering stronger school-family partnerships and engaging parents through community initiatives may be considered to maximize the platforms potential to promote healthier eating habits and improve nutritional awareness among children and their families, across the region.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 13%
22.7%
2
Public Health Nutrition
based on 14 papers
Top 0.2%
12.6%
3
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 1%
8.6%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 8%
5.1%
5
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
based on 10 papers
Top 0.5%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 4%
3.4%
7
Frontiers in Nutrition
based on 13 papers
Top 0.7%
3.4%
8
Archives of Public Health
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 6%
3.2%
10
The Journal of Nutrition
based on 11 papers
Top 0.8%
3.2%
11
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 27%
3.2%
12
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
based on 15 papers
Top 0.7%
2.9%
13
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 5%
2.8%
14
F1000Research
based on 28 papers
Top 0.5%
2.8%
15
Public Health in Practice
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
Nutrients
based on 43 papers
Top 3%
1.8%
17
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
based on 36 papers
Top 5%
1.5%
18
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
based on 16 papers
Top 1.0%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 22%
0.9%
20
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 81%
0.9%
21
Current Developments in Nutrition
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
22
BMJ Public Health
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Public Health
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.8%