Back

Classification of indeterminate and off-target cell types within human kidney organoid differentiation

Wilson, S. B.; Vanslambrouck, J. M.; Murphy, A.; Neavin, D. R.; Powell, J. E.; Howden, S. E.; Little, M. H.

2025-05-19 cell biology
10.1101/2025.05.16.654519 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human pluripotent stem cell-derived organoids are multicellular models of developing tissues proposed to recapitulate developmental stages of lineage commitment across time. Assessing how accurately protocols recapitulate development is challenged by the lack of accurate reference data sets for early human development, the presence of off-target states and the potential to form cellular states not present in vivo. This study addresses these challenges with respect to differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to kidney organoids. Based on a factorial single-cell transcriptomic analysis across a 27-day differentiation protocol, including 150,957 cells collected at five time points, we present a comprehensive classification of predicted identity, representing an in vitro temporal transcriptional atlas. For early stages, cellular identity was defined in relation to existing human developmental data across time and organ system. As renal structures arose, this was coupled with the kidney-specific classification methods. In this way we identify predicted cellular states, predictable off-target cell types based on embryology and transitional mesodermal populations with no clear in vivo equivalent. An analysis of all existing single cell data on this same protocol suggests the presence of the same off-target trajectories irrespective of cell line or laboratory. This study provides a valuable resource to better identify and understand how off-target populations arise in vitro, benefiting the advancement of kidney organoid technologies towards therapeutic outcomes.

Published in iScience (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.