Back

The effects of Arabian jasmine on zebrafish behavior depends on strain, sex, and personality

Atiratana, T.; Goldson, A. R.; Samosorn, S.; Rajput, N.; Praphairaksit, N.; Kenney, J. W.

2025-05-19 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.05.16.654482 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Jasminum sambac (L.) Aiton, commonly known as Arabian jasmine, is widely used in Thai traditional medicine for mental health ailments. While most studies in humans and animals find that Arabian jasmine reduces stress and anxiety, there are a handful of reports that it can oppose relaxation by increasing autonomic arousal. Using adult zebrafish, we sought to determine whether factors like strain, sex, and personality might contribute to the variable effects of J. sambac on anxiety-related behavior. The flowers of J. sambac were extracted by ultrasonic-assisted extraction with optimal air pressure. Headspace solid-phase microextraction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) identified the main components in the Arabian jasmine flower extract, including linalool (an anxiolytic compound) and benzaldehyde. We fed three strains of zebrafish (AB, TL, and WIK) a gelatin pellet containing different concentrations of J. sambac (5-20 mg kg-1) and assessed 3-dimensional swim behavior in the novel tank and mirror biting tests. We found that in female AB fish, J. sambac resulted in a decrease in bottom distance during the novel tank test, consistent with an anxiogenic effect; there was no effect in WIK or TL fish. We also found that behavioral/personality type influenced the effects of J. sambac where shy AB females increased their percent explored, consistent with an anxiolytic effect. Thus, we find that sex, genetics, and personality interact to influence the anxiety-related effects of Arabian jasmine suggesting that these factors may contribute to the opposing effects of Arabian jasmine reported in the literature.

Published in PLOS ONE (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.