Antimicrobial concentrations in the cornea and aqueous humour: a meta-analysis
McLean, K.; Dawson, G.; Foulkes, D.; Herbert, R.; Popova, P.; Bernard-Deshong, D.; Massie, V.; Borgia, A.; Airaldi, M.; Somerville, T.; Czanner, G.; Neal, T.; Tuft, S.; Kaye, S. B.
Show abstract
AimTo interpret the likely clinical susceptibility of isolates from microbial keratitis we performed a meta-analysis of published data that measured the concentrations of, topically applied, antimicrobials in the cornea or aqueous humour. We then correlated these values with the in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Methods and AnalysisWe searched PubMed to identify studies reporting aqueous and/or corneal concentrations of 53 topically applied ocular antimicrobials, spanning the following classes: beta-lactams, glycopeptides, aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol, lincosamides, macrolides, oxazolidinones, steroidal antimicrobials, tetracyclines, diaminopyrimidines, sulfonamides, lipopeptides and polymyxins. For each class, two clinicians independently screened the abstracts. For articles that met the inclusion criteria, data were extracted on participant species, antimicrobial concentration, dosing regimens, epithelial status, and measurement methods. Concentrations were standardised to mg/L. First quartile concentrations (EQ1) were extrapolated from the mean and standard deviation or calculated from the contained data where available. The data were tabulated to generate the EQ1 concentrations for the aqueous and cornea of each antimicrobial, stratified by applied concentration and dosing regimen. ResultsWe screened 7247 publications. Eighty-one publications were included in the meta-analysis, comprising data on the aqueous and/or corneal concentrations of twenty-eight antimicrobials. Bioassay was the most frequently used method for quantifying antimicrobial concentrations (25 studies), followed by liquid chromatography and fluorescence assays (18 studies each), mass spectrometry (12 studies), and radioactivity and colorimetric assays (three studies each). ConclusionWe provide a practical resource for clinicians to assess whether the expected EQ1 of an antimicrobial in the cornea is above the in vitro MIC of the pathogen. This reduces reliance on systemic break-point concentrations enabling evidence-based antimicrobial treatment decisions for microbial keratitis. KEY MESSAGESO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on the topicC_ST_ABSMicrobial keratitis (MK) is a major cause of preventable blindness worldwide. The susceptibility of an isolate is based on systemic breakpoint criteria that may not reflect corneal or aqueous concentrations following topical application. What this study addsWe provide a comprehensive and standardised resource of corneal and aqueous antimicrobial concentrations following topical application. This enables treatment decisions based on the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the isolate and the expected tissue concentration of the antimicrobial for evidence-based management of MK. How this study might affect research, practice or policyThis study provides a practical resource linking in vitro antimicrobial MIC values to anticipated ocular drug concentrations, enabling more precise treatment of microbial keratitis, supporting research and the development of clinical guidelines.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Examination of a first-in-class bis-dialkylnorspermidine-terphenyl antibiotic in topical formulation against mono and polymicrobial biofilms 93%
- The evaluation of a web‐based tool for measuring the uncorrected visual acuity and refractive error in keratoconus eyes: a prospective open‐label method comparison study 92%
- Establishing defined daily doses (DDDs) for antimicrobial agents used for pigs, cattle and poultry in Japan and comparing them with European DDD values 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combined vitrectomy, near-confluent endolaser, bevacizumab and cyclophotocoagulation for neovascular glaucoma 91%
- Extracting novel antimicrobial emergence events from scientific literature and medical reports 89%
- Bacterial and Fungal Co-Infections among ICU COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients in a Palestinian Hospital: Incidence and Antimicrobial Stewardship 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bacterial Sensitivity to Chlorhexidine and Povidone-Iodine Antiseptics Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human-Derived Data 95%
- The safety profile of Bald's eyesalve for the treatment of bacterial infections 95%
- Hybrid Derivative of Cathelicidin and Human Beta Defensin-2 Against Gram-Positive Bacteria: A Novel Approach for the Treatment of Bacterial Keratitis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic Performance of Deep Learning in Infectious Keratitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol 94%
- Criteria to Achieve Safe Antimicrobial Intravenous-to-Oral Switch in Hospitalised Adult Populations: A Systematic Rapid Review 92%
- Perceptions, views and practices regarding antibiotic prescribing and stewardship among hospital physicians in Jakarta, Indonesia 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.