Back

Personalized Home-Based Cognitive-motor Training using Exergames in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Seinsche, J.; de Bruin, E.; Saibene, E.; Knechtle, D.; De Bon, D.; Rizzo, F.; Carpinella, I.; Ruetsche, J.; Ferrarin, M.; Villa, R.; Moza, S.; Giannouli, E.

2025-05-16 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2025.05.15.25327487 medRxiv
Show abstract

In an aging population, exergames, a means for simultaneous cognitive-motor training, in a telerehabilitation setting show promise in overcoming treatment accessibility issues. This study aimed to investigate feasibility and effectiveness of a 10-week home-based stepping exergame training program (60 min/week) under remote supervision in older adults as compared to usual care. An international pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in Switzerland, Italy, and Cyprus, including 127 older adults aged [≥]60 years, who were randomly allocated to an intervention (n=62) or a control group (n=65). The adherence rate was 101.4%, the attrition rate 11.8%, and the average exergame enjoyment was rated with 69.1{+/-}18.7 out of 100 points. Significant interaction effects were observed in the Go/No-Go test (Q(1, 53.17)=5.44, p=.02) and significant differences between pre- and post-measurements in the intervention group were found when analyzing the 3 study sites separately (ABC (CY, r=.38, p=.05), Go/No-Go (IT, r=3.0, p=.03), Flexi (CH, r=.67, p=.007), TUG (CH, r=.52, p=.04; CY=r.46, p=.02)). Thus, the step-based exergame intervention appeared to be feasible and safe for older adults, supporting its application in out-patient rehabilitation settings. Additionally, it was effective in improving response inhibition. However, to enhance physical functions, especially in non-acute patients, it may be necessary to increase the training load. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05751551

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Aging
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.5%
3
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.6%
5
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.5%
7
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
8
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
9
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
10
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
13
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
15
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
17
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
25
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%