Back

Personalized Home-Based Cognitive-motor Training using Exergames in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Seinsche, J.; de Bruin, E.; Saibene, E.; Knechtle, D.; De Bon, D.; Rizzo, F.; Carpinella, I.; Ruetsche, J.; Ferrarin, M.; Villa, R.; Moza, S.; Giannouli, E.

2025-05-16 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2025.05.15.25327487 medRxiv
Show abstract

In an aging population, exergames, a means for simultaneous cognitive-motor training, in a telerehabilitation setting show promise in overcoming treatment accessibility issues. This study aimed to investigate feasibility and effectiveness of a 10-week home-based stepping exergame training program (60 min/week) under remote supervision in older adults as compared to usual care. An international pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in Switzerland, Italy, and Cyprus, including 127 older adults aged [≥]60 years, who were randomly allocated to an intervention (n=62) or a control group (n=65). The adherence rate was 101.4%, the attrition rate 11.8%, and the average exergame enjoyment was rated with 69.1{+/-}18.7 out of 100 points. Significant interaction effects were observed in the Go/No-Go test (Q(1, 53.17)=5.44, p=.02) and significant differences between pre- and post-measurements in the intervention group were found when analyzing the 3 study sites separately (ABC (CY, r=.38, p=.05), Go/No-Go (IT, r=3.0, p=.03), Flexi (CH, r=.67, p=.007), TUG (CH, r=.52, p=.04; CY=r.46, p=.02)). Thus, the step-based exergame intervention appeared to be feasible and safe for older adults, supporting its application in out-patient rehabilitation settings. Additionally, it was effective in improving response inhibition. However, to enhance physical functions, especially in non-acute patients, it may be necessary to increase the training load. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05751551

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.