Back

Modeling Immunosenescence on-a-chip: a platform for cancer vaccine efficacy assessment

Maity, S.; Hassani Najafabadi, A.; Kawakita, S.; Khorsandi, D.; Yilgor, C.; Jewell, C.; Mohaghegh, N.; Dokmeci, M. R.; Khademhosseini, A.; Jucaud, V.

2025-05-18 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.05.14.654059 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Immunosenescence dramatically reduces cancer vaccine efficacy in elderly patients, who represent the majority of cancer cases. Despite this clinical reality, age-related immune decline is rarely considered in preclinical testing. Therefore, novel in vitro models to test cancer vaccine efficacy, considering immunosenescence, are needed. Our novel lymph node paracortex on-a-chip (LNPoC) platform addresses this gap by recapitulating age-dependent immune responses against cancer vaccines, specifically antigen presentation, antigen-specific T cell activation, and antitumoral responses. Using this platform, we demonstrated that bone marrow-derived antigen-presenting cells (APCs) from young mice (6-7 weeks) displayed significantly enhanced ovalbumin (OVA) peptide presentation compared to APCs from older mice (35-36 weeks). This age-dependent difference translated to significantly greater OVA-specific CD8+ T cell activation and increased cytotoxicity against B16-OVA cancer cells. These age-dependent differences are unique to our LNPoC and undetectable in traditional 2D cultures, confirming that our LNPoC was more effective than 2D cultures at recapitulating immunosenescence-mediated immune responses against cancer vaccines in vitro. The in vivo validation confirms these findings, as young mice demonstrated higher OVA-specific CD8+ T cell responses and smaller tumors than older mice. Our LNPoC is a valuable tool for assessing immunosenescences impact on cancer vaccines, potentially guiding more effective therapies for older adults.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.