Applications of Artificial Intelligence in clinical decision-making and technical support in Oncology: A Scoping Review protocol
Chamoso Alaca, E.; Aranguiz, C.; Bracchiglione, J.; Bonfill Cosp, X.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe management of cancer care generates vast amounts of data, collected in the clinical registry; however, the interpretation of these unstandardized and heterogeneous records is often challenging. Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a promising tool in healthcare, particularly in Oncology, where early diagnosis, complex therapies, long term follow-up and the impact on quality of life are paramount. This technology offers significant opportunities to support clinical decision-making and optimize the management of clinical data. Nevertheless, the literature describing how AI is concretely applied to support decision-making and administrative workflow in oncology remains scattered. ObjectiveThe aim is to identify evidence regarding the use of AI in Oncology, focusing on its role in supporting clinical decision-making and technical procedures across the entire cancer care continuum. MethodsThis scoping review will analyze primary studies published between 2020 and 2025. Eligibility criteria will be determined based on the PCC framework: Population (cancer patients), Concept (AI), and Context (clinical records). Studies focusing solely on population registries, those lacking identifiable AI use, as well as narrative reviews, will be excluded. Relevant literature will be identified through a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL. Additionally, forward citation tracking and review of existing systematic reviews will be conducted. Two independent reviewers will screen articles by titles and abstracts and consequently by full-text, using RAYYAN software. Data extraction will include the following items: cancer type, specific AI technique, the model or tool used, clinical utility, primary recipient (patient or health professional), stage of implementation, and reported outcomes or limitations. Quality assessment or bias evaluation will not be performed. Findings will be synthesized narratively and, where appropriate, represented graphically. Potential ResultsThis research is expected to provide a comprehensive synthesis of AI applications in Oncology, highlighting the current role of this technology in enhancing the management of medical records and supporting clinical decision-making in the cancer care continuum. Expected outcomes include evidence of an upward trend in recent publications on the subject, a classification of techniques and models, a catalog of approved AI-based tools, distinctions between patient-oriented and healthcare professional support tools, and the identification of key limitations. ConclusionThe findings of this review will enable clinicians and patients to gain insights into the current landscape of AI in Oncology, identify future research directions, and develop evidence-based strategies for the responsible integration of AI into cancer care. The goal is to position this technology as a supportive tool that complements, rather than replaces, healthcare professionals.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol For Human Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Clinical Consultations 93%
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 93%
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors affecting COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients - A first report from Guys Cancer Centre in London 90%
- Diagnostic accuracy and safety of coaxial core-needle biopsy (CNB) system in Oncology patients treated in a specialist cancer centre with prospective validation within clinical trial data 89%
- Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Breast Cancer Using Deep Learning on Primary Tumor Biopsy Slides 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language model-based information extraction from free-text radiology reports: a scoping review protocol 93%
- Palliative care in the treatment of women with breast cancer: a scoping review protocol 91%
- Surgical Resection, Radiotherapy, And Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can Large Language Models Aid Caregivers of Pediatric Cancer Patients in Information Seeking? A Cross-Sectional Investigation 95%
- Making prognostic algorithms useful in shared decision-making: Patients and clinicians’ requirements for the Predict:Breast Cancer interface 90%
- A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients with Cancer 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A CDE-based data structure for radiotherapeutic decision-making in breast cancer 95%
- Automated abstraction of clinical parameters of multiple myeloma from real-world clinical notes using large language models 94%
- An Ontology-based Approach to Guide and Document Variable and Data Source Selection and Data Integration Process to Support Integrative Data Analysis in Cancer Outcomes Research 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.