Back

Discrete-Event Simulation Model for Cancer Interventions and Population Health in R (DESCIPHR): An Open-Source Pipeline

Pi, S.; Rutter, C.; Pineda-Antunez, C.; Chen, J. H.; Goldhaber-Fiebert, J. D.; Alarid-Escudero, F.

2025-05-13 health policy
10.1101/2025.05.12.25327470 medRxiv
Show abstract

Simulation models inform health policy decisions by integrating data from multiple sources and forecasting outcomes when there is a lack of comprehensive evidence from empirical studies. Such models have long supported health policy for cancer, the first or second leading cause of death in over 100 countries. Discrete-event simulation (DES) and Bayesian calibration have gained traction in the field of Decision Science because they enable flexible modeling of complex health conditions and produce estimates of model parameters that reflect real-world disease epidemiology and data uncertainty given model constraints. This uncertainty is then propagated to model-generated outputs, enabling decision makers to assess confidence in recommendations and estimate the value of collecting additional information. However, there is limited end-to-end guidance on structuring a DES model for cancer progression, estimating its parameters using Bayesian calibration, and applying the calibration outputs to policy evaluation. To fill this gap, we introduce the DES Modeling Framework for Cancer Interventions and Population Health in R (DESCIPHR), an open-source codebase integrating a flexible DES model for the natural history of cancer, Bayesian calibration for parameter estimation, and an example application of screening strategy evaluation. To illustrate the framework, we apply DESCIPHR to calibrate bladder and colorectal cancer models to real-world cancer registry targets. We also introduce an automated method for generating data-informed parameter prior distributions and increase the functionality of a neural network emulator-based Bayesian calibration algorithm. We anticipate that the adaptable DESCIPHR modeling template will facilitate the construction of future decision models evaluating the risks and benefits of health interventions. Key points for decision makersO_LIFor simulation models to be useful for decision-making, they should accurately reproduce real-world outcomes and their uncertainty. C_LIO_LIThe DESCIPHR framework and code repository address a gap in open-source resources to fit an individual-level model for cancer progression to real-world data and forecast the impact of cancer screening interventions while accounting for data uncertainty. C_LIO_LIThe codebase is designed to be highly adaptable for researchers who wish to apply DESCIPHR for economic evaluation or for studying methodological questions. C_LI

Published in PharmacoEconomics · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.8%
2
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.7%
3
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
5
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
6
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
8
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.5%
10
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
11
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Biometrics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
13
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.8%
15
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
Biostatistics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
18
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
21
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
22
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
Research Synthesis Methods
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
24
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%